SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 75-84.

• SHEHUI GUANLI • Previous Articles    

Service-Based Governance: The Moderating and Mediating Mechanism of Social Organizations’ Influence on Urban and Rural Residents’ Community Participation

ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng   

  1. Department of Social Work, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211167, China
  • Received:2023-04-27 Published:2023-11-15

Abstract: In the context of the increasing presence of social organizations in grassroots governance, there is a need to examine the impact and underlying logical mechanisms of these organizations’ involvement in urban and rural community participation. Based on a large dataset drawn from the government’s procurement of services from social organizations and their incorporation into grassroots governance in Jiangsu Province, this study explores the influence of social organizations’ participation in community governance and its moderating and mediating mechanisms on urban and rural community involvement. The research suggests that the extent of intervention by social organizations directly influences urban and rural community participation and indirectly encourages such involvement by influencing community social capital and satisfaction with community work. The intervention of social organizations enhances the existing factors (community social capital and community work satisfaction) affecting urban and rural residents' community participation, and such an effect is particularly prominent in urban communities and among local residents.

Key words: service-based governance, social organizations, social capital, community work satisfaction, community participation

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 方亚琴, 申会霞. 社区社会组织在社区治理中的作用[J]. 城市问题, 2019(3): 77-83
[2] 陈炜. 四川盐文化遗产旅游扶贫内生动力——基于社区参与的角度[J]. 社会科学家, 2020(1): 82-89
[3] 高红, 王佃利. 人力资本、社会资本与居民公共参与行为[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(6): 14-24
[4] 徐旻霞, 郑路. 邻里互动、主观幸福感与小镇青年社区民主政治参与[J]. 青年研究, 2022(5): 70-80, 96
[5] 徐延辉, 兰林火. 社区能力、社区效能感与城市居民的幸福感——社区社会工作介入的可能路径研究[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2014(6): 131-142, 175-176
[6] 赵聚军, 齐媛. 我国国际社区治理中的外籍居民参与——基于京津三个国际社区的观察[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(3): 27-36
[7] 方玲玲, 张云霞. 城镇居民参与社区教育意愿影响因素分析——基于Logistic回归模型[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2020(4): 55-60
[8] OHAMA E, FUKUI S, FUJITA J, et al. Factors related to preference for participation and degree of commitment in community activities among older adults in Japanese depopulated areas[J]. Health & social care in the community, 2020, 28(1): 42-50
[9] 沈洁, 罗翔. 中国大城市的设施共享与社区参与——对上海内城的实证研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021(9): 92-100
[10] 常恩予, 甄峰, 孙晨. 社区网络的使用及其对社区参与的影响——以南京市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017(7): 785-794
[11] 曾屿恬, 塔娜. 社区建成环境、社会环境与郊区居民非工作活动参与的关系——以上海市为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2019(9): 9-16
[12] 武照亮, 靳敏. 生态社区建设中居民参与程度度量及影响因素研究——以山东省东营市社区调查为例[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2023(6): 885-891
[13] 方舒. 协同治理视角下“三社联动”的实践反思与理论重构[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2020(2): 157-164
[14] 任敏. “五社联动”参与社区治理的三种模式及其共同特点[J]. 中国社会工作, 2021(10): 28-30
[15] 郭伟和. “五社联动”: 政府购买服务从“竞标”转向“授权”的实际行动[J]. 中国社会工作, 2022(33): 8
[16] 赵迪, 张志鹏, 张伟. 多主体联动动员: 社区居民志愿服务参与的新视角[J]. 中国志愿服务研究, 2021(4): 121-146, 201
[17] BAKIC H, AJDUKOVIC D. Resilience after natural disasters: the process of harnessing resources in communities differentially exposed to a flood[J]. European journal of psychotraumatology, 2021, 12(1). DOI:10.1080/20008198. 2021.1891733.
[18] ISLARY J. Ensuring public healthcare service and health rights in communities through participatory health governance[J]. Indian journal of health and well-being, 2021, 12(4): 466-469
[19] TANGA P T, MUNDAU M. The impact of donor-funded community empowerment projects on poverty alleviation in Zimbabwe[J]. Perspectives on global development & technology, 2014, 13(4): 465-480
[20] 俞可平. 治理与善治[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2000: 4.
[21] 燕继荣. 社会变迁与社会治理——社会治理的理论解释[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(5): 69-77
[22] 陈伟东, 许宝君. 社区治理社会化: 一个分析框架[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017(3): 21-29
[23] 王思斌. 社会工作参与社会治理的特点及其贡献——对服务型治理的再理解[J]. 社会治理, 2015(1): 49-57
[24] 王思斌. 社会治理结构的进化与社会工作的服务型治理[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014(6): 30-37
[25] 徐宇珊. 服务型治理: 社区服务中心参与社区治理的角色与路径[J]. 社会科学, 2016(10): 99-106
[26] 李文静, 张越森. 弱势群体社区参与特征、影响因素与动员策略——基于北京、淄博市部分社区的调查[J]. 社会工作, 2021(5): 88-100,109-110
[27] CAMPBELL C, KAWACHI I I, SUBRAMANIAN S. Social capital, social movements and global public health: fighting for health-enabling contexts in marginalised settings[J]. Social science & medicine, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.004.
[28] 李丁. 社区参与的层次性与累积发展——以北京回天地区为例[J]. 社会建设, 2021(3): 48-60
[29] CHEUNG C, HO W. Investing in community participation to receive social support[J]. Journal of social service research, 2012, 38(1): 110-123
[30] 唐有财, 侯秋宇. 身份、场域和认同: 流动人口的社区参与及其影响机制研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(3): 1-10
[31] KHWAJA A. Can good projects succeed in bad communities?[J]. Journal of public economics, 2009, 93(7–8): 899-916
[32] 罗伯特•帕特南. 使民主运转起来[M]. 王列, 赖海榕, 译. 南昌: 江西人民出版社, 2001: 103-115.
[33] 高红, 杨秀勇. 社会组织融入社区治理: 理论、实践与路径[J]. 新视野, 2018(1): 77-83
[34] 田北海, 王连生. 城乡居民社区参与的障碍因素与实现路径[J]. 学习与实践, 2017(12): 98-105
[35] 林诚彦, 卓彩琴. 社会工作参与社区治理的理论选择与实践整合——基于社区能力建设理论的社区服务行动研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022(6): 77-91
[36] 高丽. 行动者与空间生产: 社会组织参与城市社区绿色治理何以可能——以W组织为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019(3): 23-31
[37] 王思斌. 社会工作在创新社会治理体系中的地位和作用——一种基础—服务型社会治理[J]. 社会工作, 2014(1): 3-10,150
[1] ZHANG Tianzhen, FEI Meiping. Will More Public Interest Property Promote Information Disclosure in Social Organizations? Chain Intermediary of Council Governance and Internal System Building [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(5): 69-77.
[2] LI Qiaoming, Zhou Ziyue. Adaptable Compatibility as the Transformation Action Strategies & Logic of Civil Supportive Social Organizations: Based on Field Work of X Organization in G City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(3): 80-91.
[3] FANG Ying. Research on the Development of Social Organization from the Perspective of Social Innovation [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(2): 30-36,73.
[4] GU Jiangxia, CHEN Minyi, ZHANG Yanyu. Positively-Guided Participation: A Comparative Study on Engagement of Community-Based Organizations in Residential Districts on Community Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(1): 81-90.
[5] ZHU Hao, XU Shuhong. The Dilemma and Mechanism Innovation of Social Organizations Participating in the Supply of Children’s Welfare Services: A Case Study of Shanghai [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 70-78.
[6] HUANG Dan, LUO Yingting. Social Capital, Social Support and Subjective Well-Being of Migrant Children:Based on the Investigation during the COVID-19 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(1): 32-40.
[7] CHEN Jing. External and Internal Forces: Analysis of Access to Opportunities for Social Organizations to Participate in Social Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(1): 69-77.
[8] ZHUO Caiqin, ZHANG Xuehui, ZHANG Qianxin. The Path of Social Organizations for the Disabled to Participate in Social Governance: A Case Study Based on Guangdong Association of the Blind [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(6): 50-60.
[9] WU Xiaolong, KANG Xuhui. Participation Logic and Practical Dilemma of Multiple Subjects in Grid Governance: An Analysis Perspective of the Empowerment Theory [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(5): 83-89.
[10] FANG Ying. Cooperation with Boundary: The New Relationship between Social Work Organization, the Subdistrict Office and the Neighborhood Committee [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(4): 58-68.
[11] GU Jiang-xia. Exploring the Forming Process of “Community, Social Organizations and Social Workers” Joint Action Mechanism in Urban Community: Based on the Experience of a Pilot Plan in S City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(6): 86-92.
[12] LIU Susu, ZHANG Hao. Social Work Intervention Path for the Social Inclusion of the Elderly Migrants [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(6): 19-25,44.
[13] Huang Haiping. Reconstruction of Confucian Cultural Capital in Urban Community Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(5): 61-66.
[14] OUYANG Zhen, YANG Rong. Research on Construction of Social Capital in Community Participatory Mutual Aid System: A Case Study of Shunyi Community in Jinan City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(2): 59-65.
[15] LAI Shuai. The Innovative Development Path of Community-Social Organization-Social Worker Combined Interaction in Tibetan Urban Communities [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(1): 69-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!