SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 80-89.

• SHEHUI GUANLI • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Problem of Goals Displacement in Social Organization Program Operation and Its Governance

NIE Yumei1, GU Donghui2   

  1. 1. School of Law, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310018, China;
    2. School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
  • Received:2023-11-02 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-05-15

Abstract: Our analysis of the project operation process of social organizations suggests that social organizations are too tired to complete the quantitative indicators of the project, while ignoring the project effectiveness in terms of demand satisfaction and value enhancement. Clients’ demands are often replaced by the assessment index and the management’s requirements. , In the process of project operation, it is commonly observed that contents of the project are replaced by forms. In such projects, there is a tendency to emphasize documentation over service, focus on service activities and entertainment, have selective and fragmented clients, and encourage repeated participation of the clients. Without sufficient need assessment and with overemphasis on quantitative indicators in goal settings, plus the absence of two-way communication mechanisms in implementation and the heavy reliance on documentation and financial evaluation in external supervisions, social organizations have catered to evaluation and weakened service effectiveness. Due to the lack of resources and skilled personnel, social organizations find it challenging to carry out professional development, which results in various goals displacement phenomena. In order to address the problem of goals displacement in project operation, it is necessary to conduct a scientific pre-evaluation before signing the contract, reduce the strict quantitative indicators in the contract, strengthen the construction of two-way communication mechanism, emphasize the evaluation of service effectiveness, and encourage the joint efforts of social organizations to build professional services.

Key words: goals replacement, social organization, program management, program operation

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 折晓叶, 陈婴婴. 项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑——对“项目进村”案例的社会学分析[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(4): 126-148, 223
[2] 陈为雷. 政府和非营利组织项目运作机制、策略和逻辑——对政府购买社会工作服务项目的社会学分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2014(3): 93-105, 142-143
[3] 杜春林, 张新文. 从制度安排到实际运行: 项目制的生存逻辑与两难处境[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015(1): 82-88, 126
[4] 王清. 项目制与社会组织服务供给困境: 对政府购买服务项目化运作的分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(4): 59-65
[5] 吴斌才. 从分类控制到嵌入式治理: 项目制运作背后的社会组织治理转型[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2016(3): 80-87,128
[6] 聂玉梅, 华玥琪. 管家理论视角下社会组织的项目制治理与策略[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(3): 333-341
[7] 陈尧, 马梦妤. 项目制政府购买的逻辑: 诱致性社会组织的“内卷化”[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(4): 108-119
[8] 战旭英. 地方政府绩效考核中的目标置换现象审视[J]. 理论探索, 2023(5): 68-74
[9] 任弢. 从环境整治到乡村振兴: 美丽乡村项目中的目标置换如何发生?——以浙江安吉为例[J]. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(5): 15-26
[10] 张海. 基层政府购买社会组织服务中的目标置换问题及其治理[J]. 学习与实践, 2021(4): 95-105
[11] 陈钰. 目标置换的成因、危害与对策研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2012(5): 207-210
[12] WARNER W K, HAVENS A E. Goal displacement and the intangibility of organization goals[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1968, 12(4): 539-555
[13] 华玥琪. 目标与成效: 社会组织项目运作机制研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江理工大学, 2021: 12.
[14] 陈康丽. 基于成效导向的社会工作服务项目评估研究——以成都市A社区社区营造项目为例[D]. 成都: 西华大学, 2020: 8.
[15] 刘江, 顾东辉. 方法为本、理论驱动与机制分析——社会工作服务效果评估的三种策略[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021(6): 5-13
[16] 杨宝. 嵌入结构、资源动员与项目执行效果——政府购买社会组织服务的案例比较研究[J]. 公共管理学报, 2018(3): 39-50, 155-156
[17] 邹珊珊, 黄叶青, 杨蓓蕾. 政府购买社会组织服务的目标置换研究——基于多重逻辑的分析视角[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(6): 75-88, 102
[18] 刘帅顺, 谈小燕. 制度规则、实践阐释与目标置换: 政府购买服务中的自由裁量逻辑[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2023(1): 54-64
[19] 闪诚章. 社会工作机构文书的目标置换与管理[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2020: 32-33.
[20] 黄晓星, 熊慧玲. 过渡治理情境下的中国社会服务困境——基于Z市社会工作服务的研究[J]. 社会, 2018(4): 133-159
[21] 杭州市民政局办公室关于社会组织申报2022年度市级公益创投项目通知[EB/OL]. (2022-05-07). http://mz.hangzhou.gov.cn/art/2022/5/7/art_1535309_58930494.html.
[22] MOXHAM C. Performance measurement: examining the applicability of the existing body of knowledge to nonprofit organizations[J]. International journal of operations & production management, 2009, 29(7): 740-763
[23] 聂玉梅, 黎江. 委托代理视角下社会服务项目第三方评估实践及其运作逻辑——基于H市实践的调查[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2020(5): 42-52
[24] MOULTON S, ECKERD A. Preserving the publicness of the nonprofit sector: resources, roles, and public values[J]. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 2012, 41(4): 656-685
[25] SERGIO F. What works best when contracting for services? an analysis of contracting performance at the local level in the US[J]. Public administration, 2007, 85(4): 1119-1141
[1] PANG Jiahui, ZHANG Zhaohua, QI Fei. Boundary Production of Social Work Organization, Form and Logic: A Case Study of a Social Work Organization in City A in Hainan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(2): 69-78.
[2] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng. Service-Based Governance: The Moderating and Mediating Mechanism of Social Organizations’ Influence on Urban and Rural Residents’ Community Participation [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(6): 75-84.
[3] ZHANG Tianzhen, FEI Meiping. Will More Public Interest Property Promote Information Disclosure in Social Organizations? Chain Intermediary of Council Governance and Internal System Building [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(5): 69-77.
[4] LI Qiaoming, Zhou Ziyue. Adaptable Compatibility as the Transformation Action Strategies & Logic of Civil Supportive Social Organizations: Based on Field Work of X Organization in G City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(3): 80-91.
[5] ZHU Yuanyuan, WANG Xinglong, WU Junxia. Research on Service Strategies of Social Organizations Participating in the Construction of Social Support Network for Children in Distress: Taking the Project of S Organization in Guangzhou as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(2): 18-29.
[6] FANG Ying. Research on the Development of Social Organization from the Perspective of Social Innovation [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(2): 30-36,73.
[7] ZHU Hao, XU Shuhong. The Dilemma and Mechanism Innovation of Social Organizations Participating in the Supply of Children’s Welfare Services: A Case Study of Shanghai [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 70-78.
[8] CHEN Jing. External and Internal Forces: Analysis of Access to Opportunities for Social Organizations to Participate in Social Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(1): 69-77.
[9] ZHUO Caiqin, ZHANG Xuehui, ZHANG Qianxin. The Path of Social Organizations for the Disabled to Participate in Social Governance: A Case Study Based on Guangdong Association of the Blind [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(6): 50-60.
[10] QIN Qing, LIANG Lihong, Li Debo. Mechanism Exploration on Resource Integration of Social Organizations in Child Protection from the Perspective of Organizational Field [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(2): 59-67.
[11] ZHANG Chao, ZHANG Jiayuan. Employee Expectations, Organizational Accountability and Legitimacy: The Establishment of Internal Legitimacy in Social Service Organizations [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(2): 68-75,84.
[12] LI Ling'ou. Hierarchical Governance and Organizational Legitimacy: The Dual Logic and Realization Methods for Social Organizations to Coordinate Response to Emergencies [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(6): 78-88.
[13] FANG Ying. Cooperation with Boundary: The New Relationship between Social Work Organization, the Subdistrict Office and the Neighborhood Committee [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(4): 58-68.
[14] ZHU Yuanyuan. Folded Relationship: Real Space and Practice Path of Social Organizations Participating in Urban Grassroots Governance: Taking Government Purchase Social Work Services in G City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(4): 69-77,96.
[15] ZHOU Ling, DU Juan. Current Status and Influencing Factors of Financial Literacy of Chinese NGO Workers: Based on the Results of 956 Questionnaires in 31 provinces, City and Autonompus Region in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(2): 32-40.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!