SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3): 51-58.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Practical Tensions and Institutional Innovation of the Child Protection: A Case Study of Child Abuse in Nanjing

HU Jierong   

  1. School of Sociology, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 102249, China
  • Received:2017-10-10 Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-11

Abstract: Child protection has drawn the academic and social attention. From the Child Abuse Case in Nanjing, the practical dilemmas in the child protection practice demonstrate the multiple tensions. The first one is ambiguous definition between the child abuse and physical punishment in the cultural construction of child abuse. The second is the gap between judicial justice and social functional recovery. The third tension is the rights conflicts between the different subjects and the child, and the collisions within the multiple aspects of the children rights. On such basis, the paper proposes to intensify institutional innovation of child protection to cope with the practical dilemmas in intervening child abuse. Firstly, improve the common definition of child abuse and make the public acknowledge it as a social problem. Secondly, on the macro level of child protection system, keep the balance of the rights among the state, parents and the children, and advocate the child welfare policy to support children's families; on the micro level, integrate child abuse intervention system to incorporate child protection and family service, increase the families' function of supporting children. Lastly, the social work's participation and cooperation of social work and judicial sectors should be introduced.

Key words: child protection, child abuse, children's rights, child welfare policy

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 儿童权利公约[EB/OL].[2017-8-30]. http://www.un.org/chinese/children/issue/crc.shtml.
[2] 尚晓援. 儿童保护制度的基本要素[J]. 社会福利(理论版), 2014(8):2-5.
[3] CICCHETTI D, CARLSON V. Child maltreatment:theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 1989:14.
[4] WHO. Report of the consultation on child abuse prevention[R]. Geneva:World Health Organization, 1999:5-16.
[5] 祝玉红. 聆听与尊重:儿童权利视角下对儿童虐待经验的探索性研究[J]. 中国青年研究, 2013(4):50-54.
[6] 乔东平, 谢倩雯. 中西方"儿童虐待"认识差异的逻辑根源[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2015(1):25-32.
[7] 彼特·博格,托马斯·卢克曼. 知识社会学——社会实体的建构[M]. 邹理民,译.台北:巨流图书公司,1991:27-34.
[8] 埃米尔·涂尔干.社会分工论[M].渠敬东,译.北京:三联书店, 2000:48-74.
[9] 郭伟和.走在社会恢复和治理技术之间——中国司法社会工作的实践策略述评[J]. 社会建设, 2015(4):38-48.
[10] 中华人民共和国未成年人保护法(主席令第六十号)[EB/OL].[2016-03-14]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2006-12/29/content_2602198.htm.
[11] 中华人民共和国婚姻法(修正)[EB/OL]. (2001-05-30).http://www.npc.gov.cn/wxzl/gongbao/2001-05/30/content_5136774.htm.
[12] 李静, 宋佳. 家庭儿童虐待中的权利冲突及其法律控制[J]. 广西社会科学, 2015(12):121-126.
[13] 葛忠明, 迟兴臣. 社会问题:过程及其实践的空间[J]. 文史哲, 2003(5):138-143.
[14] BISSELL S, BOYDEN J, COOK P, MYERS W. Rethinking Child Protection from a rights perspective:some observations for discussion.[EB/OL].[2018-01-20]. https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/2053964005_Susan_Bissell.
[15] KIRTON DEREK. Child social work policy and practice:an introduction[M]. London:Sage Publication Ltd. 2009:7.
[16] 乔东平, 谢倩雯.西方儿童福利理念和政策演变及对中国的启示[J]. 东岳论丛, 2014(11):116-122.
[17] 满小欧, 李月娥.美国儿童福利政策变革与儿童保护制度——从"自由放任"到"回归家庭"[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2014(2):94-98.
[18] 最高人民法院, 最高人民检察院, 公安部, 等. 关于依法处理监护人侵害未成年人权益行为若干问题的意见[EB/OL]. (2014-12-29). http://www.kids21.cn/zcwj/201412/t20141229_308405.htm.
[19] 国务院. 关于加强困境儿童保障工作的意见[EB/OL]. (2016-06-16). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-06/16/content_5082800.htm.
[20] JENSON J, FRASER M. Social policy for children and family a risk and resilience perspective[M]. London:Sage publications, Inc. 2006:23.
[21] GILBERT N. Combating child abuse:international perspectives and trends[M].New York:Oxford University Press, 1997:3-5.
[22] 刘玉兰, 彭华民. 西方儿童保护社会工作的理论转型与实践重构[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2017 (3):5-11.
[23] 胡杰容. 家庭维护服务:美国实践与中国意义[J]. 澳门理工学报, 2013(2):149-155.
[24] 沈黎, 吕静淑. 台湾儿童保护服务的实践与启示[J]. 当代青年研究, 2014(5):79-84.
[1] FENG Yuan. The Social Characteristics and Prevention Strategies of Child Sexual Assault [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(3): 72-77.
[2] QIN Qing, LIANG Lihong, Li Debo. Mechanism Exploration on Resource Integration of Social Organizations in Child Protection from the Perspective of Organizational Field [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(2): 59-67.
[3] WU Yanhua, CUI Xiaohui. Constraints and Solutions for Implementation of Child Protection Policy: Based on the Analysis of Smith’s Policy Implementation Process Model [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(3): 92-100.
[4] LIN Dian. Study on the Dilemma of Implementing Mandatory Reporting System for Child Abuse in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(6): 64-71.
[5] QIAO Dongping, LIAN Tingting, SU Linwei. The New Development of China's Child Welfare Policy and Consideration on the New Era Policy: Based on the Policy Literature since 2010 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(3): 78-88,95.
[6] ZHAO Fang, XU Yanfeng, CHEN Honglin. Analysis of Children Protection Policy and Construction of Family-centered Children Protection System [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(5): 67-77.
[7] LIN Dian. The Research on Social Work Intervention Strategy for Child Abuse in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(1): 17-23.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!