中国政府购买服务的可能陷阱及其规避路径

Abstract

Abstract: While demonstrating its positive functions, government purchase of services also gradually reveals the possible pitfalls. At present, the Chinese Government Purchase of Service presents many potential pitfalls such as loss of public characteristics, distortion of professionalism, social organization alienation, rent-seeking corruption and low service efficiency. With the deepening of social governance innovation and government governance modernization, it is imperative to clearly understand these possible traps, reduce the risk of government purchasing services, and explore the effective countermeasures, which include “strengthening legislative norms, improving purchasing mechanisms, regression of public characteristics and social regulation, enhancing professional autonomy, strengthening trade self-discipline, inclusive and sustainable development.

Key words: purchase of service, social regulation, inclusive development, professional autonomy, self-discipline of trades

CLC Number:

C916

YUAN Ming. Potential Pitfalls of Chinese Government Purchase of Service and Its Countermeasures[J].SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(1): 82-87,94.

References

[1] MULGAN R. Contracting out and accountability[J]. Australian journal of public administration, 1997, 56(4):106-116
[2] 王思斌. 政府购买服务的有效性与目标偏离[N]. 中国社会报, 2014-06-06 (005).
[3] 王浦劬, 何艳玲, 李风华. 中国政府向民间组织购买公共服务问题研究[EB/OL].[2018-12-11]. http://www.chinanpo.gov.cn/700109/92644/newswjindex.html.
[4] 吴帆, 周镇忠, 刘叶. 政府购买服务的美国经验及其对中国的借鉴意义——基于对一个公共服务个案的观察[J]. 公共行政评论, 2016(4):4-22
[5] SALAMON L M. Rethinking public management:Third-party government and changing forms of government action[J]. Public policy, 1981, 29(3):255-275
[6] FROELICH K A. Diversification of revenue strategies:Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations[J]. Nonprofit & voluntary sector quarterly, 1999, 28(3):246-268
[7] GRONBJERG K A, BRONBJERG K A, JOSSEYBASS. Understanding nonprofit funding:Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations[J]. Contemporary sociology, 1995, 24(1):103-115
[8] 何卫平, 刘滨. 服务购买中的"政社互动陷阱":发生机理与治理路径——基于四川省C市W区的实证分析[J]. 求实, 2017(6):54-64
[9] JUN G K, MOON M J. The double-edged sword of public-resource dependence:The impact of public resources on autonomy and legitimacy in Korean cultural nonprofit organizations[J]. Policy studies journal, 2007, 35(2):205-226
[10] 杨海. 中国社会结构性风险防范与治理机制研究[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(2):23-30
[11] 句华. 公共服务合同外包的适用范围:理论与实践的反差[J]. 中国行政管理, 2010(4):51-55
[12] 王婴. 中国专业社会工作的非均衡、非协调发展——历史社会学视角下国家、学术和社会的互动过程[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(1):31-41
[13] 赵康. 专业、专业属性及判断成熟专业的六条标准——一个社会学角度的分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2000(5):30-39
[14] 李晓凤. 社会工作人才队伍的专业化、职业化新发展[J]. 大社会, 2018(4):18-21
[15] 马全中. 政府向社会组织购买服务的"内卷化"及其矫正——基于B市G区购买服务的经验分析[J]. 求实, 2017(4):44-57
[16] 陈国强, 潘鸿雁. 存在与自主:国家主动建构下的"社会"[J]. 社会建设, 2017(2):66-75
[17] 王思斌. 中国社会工作的嵌入性发展[J]. 社会科学战线, 2011(2):206-222
[18] 史柏年. 教师领办服务机构:中国社会工作专业化的理性选择[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2013(3):30-35
[19] 朱健刚, 陈安娜. 嵌入中的专业社会工作与街区权力关系——对一个政府购买服务项目的个案分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(3):43-65
[20] 郑广怀, 王小姬. 政府与非政府组织的博弈——以A市工会购买社会工作服务为例[M]//李昺伟. 专业的良心——转型时代中国社会工作的守望. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2014:71-93.
[21] 邓国胜. 非营利组织评估[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2001:39-76.
[22] 吴磊. 政府向社会组织购买公共服务的风险分析及其防范机制[J]. 开发研究, 2014(3):92-95
[23] HALL D. Privatization, multinationals, and corruption[J]. Development in practice, 1999, 9(5):539-556
[24] 杨安华. 政府购买服务还是回购服务?——基于2000年以来欧美国家政府回购公共服务的考察[J]. 公共管理学报, 2014(3):49-58
[25] BOYNE G A. Bureaucratic theory meets reality:Public choice and service contracting in U. S. local government[J]. Public administration review, 1998, 58(6):474-484
[26] GERMÀ BEL, FAGEDA X, WARNER M E. Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services[J]. Irea working papers, 2010, 29(3):553-577
[27] FERRIS J. The decision to contract out:An empirical analysis[J]. Urban affairs quarterly, 1986, 22(2):289-311
[28] STEIN R M. The budgetary effects of municipal service contracting:A principal agent explanation[J]. American journal of political science, 1990, 34(2):471-502
[29] MANSER G. Further thoughts on purchase of service[J]. Social casework, 1974, 55(7):421-474
[30] MILWARD H B. Symposium on the hollow state:capacity, control and performance in inter organizational settings[J]. Journal of public administration research and theory, 1996, 6(2):193-195
[31] DELEON L, DENHARDT R. The political theory of reinvention[J]. Public administration review, 2000, 60(2):89-97
[32] SCLAR E. You don't always get what you pay for:The economics of privatization[M]. Ithaca:Cornell University Press, 2000:145-168.
[33] VAN SLYKE D. Agents or stewards:Using theory to understand the government nonprofit social service contracting relationship[J]. Journal of public administration research and theory, 2007, 17(2):157-187
[34] 唐纳德·凯特尔. 权力共享:公共治理与私人市场[M]. 孙迎春, 译. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2009:13.
[35] DEHOOG R H. Competition, negotiation, or cooperation:Three models for service contracting[J]. Administration & society, 1990, 22(3):317-340
[36] 洪大用. 应对高风险社会[J]. 瞭望新闻周刊, 2004(6):61
[37] 郑功成. 制定社会组织法刻不容缓[J]. 中国党政干部论坛, 2018(5):48-50
[38] 孙玉霞. 信息非对称视角下政府购买服务的风险及其规避[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2016(5):42-47
[39] 蔡礼强. 政府向社会组织购买公共服务的需求表达——基于三方主体的分析框架[J]. 政治学研究, 2018(1):70-81
[40] 民政部社会组织管理局. 中国社会组织公共服务平台[EB/OL].[2018-12-11]. http://www.chinanpo.gov.cn/search/orgcx.html.
[41] 张方华. 政府非正当利益与政府公共性的回归[J]. 云南社会科学, 2010(4):16-20
[42] 陈松. 公共服务民营化的假设、局限及其路径选择——公共性的回归与重构[J]. 浙江学刊, 2014(2):219-224
[43] 田千山. 公共政策公共性的偏离与回归——基于善治理论的视角[J]. 党政干部学刊, 2011(4):56-59
[44] 植草益. 微观规制经济学[M]. 北京:中国发展出版社, 1992:82.
[45] 王春城. 公共行政学视角下社会性规制的基本理论探析[J]. 行政论坛, 2006(4):16-18
[46] 高山. 政府购买服务与社会组织发展问题探讨[J]. 当代经济管理, 2015(9):44-48
[47] 郭薇, 常健. 行业协会参与社会管理的策略分析——基于行业协会促进行业自律的视角[J]. 行政论坛, 2012(2):57-62
[48] 常健, 郭薇. 行业自律的定位、动因、模式和局限[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011(1):133-140
[49] 李长远, 张会萍. 包容性发展视角下农村养老服务发展的非均衡性及调适[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2018(11):121-126
[50] 葛道顺. 包容性社会发展:从理念到政策[J]. 社会发展研究, 2014(3):212-228

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Potential Pitfalls of Chinese Government Purchase of Service and Its Countermeasures

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 8

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[2]	LI Wei, YANG Caiyun. Marketization and the “De-socialization” of Social Work: Based on the Analysis of American Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(5): 38-45.
[3]	CHEN Junjian. The Adjustment Strategy of Guangdong Social Workers’ Salary System from the Perspective of New Managementism [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(4): 89-94,101.
[4]	XU Zibin, LIANG Kun. A Suppressed Role: A Case Study of the Administrativization of Post Social Work Service in A City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 17(3): 53-60.
[5]	DING Yu, XIAO Reng. Rethinking theTernary Relationship between Purchasers, Service Providers and Users from the Problems in the Process of Purchase of Service Contracting: Taking Guangzhou as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 17(2): 5-11.
[6]	LIAO Hong-Bing. Analysis on the Significance and Developing Strategy of Establishment of Social Work Organization by College Teachers [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 15(1): 10-15.
[7]	FANG Wei. Developmentoriented Social Policy: Its Theory, Evolution, Practice and Implications [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 13(1): 5-12.
[8]	YU Bing1, GUO Weixin2. An Investigation into the Theory and Practice of Government Purchase of Services——Taking the Purchase of Social Work Service Contracting for Guangzhou Agape Social Service Center as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 12(1): 46-50.