SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 58-64.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Evaluation Mechanism for Social Work Participating in the Service of the Public Welfare Institutions

TAN Lei   

  1. School of Politics and Law, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510520, China
  • Received:2019-05-27 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-04-10

Abstract: Professional evaluation serves as the main way to test effectiveness of social work services in public welfare institutions. It can optimize their institutional management, enhance service objects’ life quality and practitioners’ professional abilities, benefit governmental and public evaluation or supervision on service purchasing. Such professional evaluation shall be of standardization, stabilization and localization, with high openness and participation.It is found that the organizational system of the evaluation involves government purchasers, third-party evaluation agencies, service objects, public welfare agencies, social work agencies and front-line social workers and other stakeholders. An equal partnership should be gradually promoted. Ethical issues shall be clarified and explained on selection of team memberships, team neutrality and protection of evaluator’s rights and interests.

Key words: public welfare institutions, social work, evaluation mechanism

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] OWEN J M, ROGERS P J. Program Evaluation-Forms and Approaches[M]. London: Sage Publications, 1999: 31-80
[2] COLIN ROBSON. 方案评估——原理与实务[M]. 张英阵, 魏希圣译. 台北: 洪叶文化事业有限公司, 2005.
[3] 陈锦棠. 香港社会服务评估与审核[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008: 133-136.
[4] 陈天红. 发达国家老年人社会工作服务成效评价标准经验分析[J]. 标准科学, 2016(3): 84-88
[5] 任高峰. 社会工作评估介入机构养老资源的分配[J]. 商, 2016(17): 105
[6] 尚振坤, 李凤河. 论机构养老资源的分配方式与社会工作评估机制的建立[J]. 社会福利(理论版), 2013(10): 13-17
[7] 范斌, 张海. 社会服务评估发展的历史性观察[J]. 理论月刊, 2014(3): 5-11
[8] 罗观翠. 社会工作服务标准是什么[N]. 中国社会报, 2014-11-14(005).
[9] 罗观翠, 王军芳. 政府购买服务的香港经验和内地发展探讨[J]. 学习与实践, 2008(9): 125-130
[10] 姚进忠, 崔坤杰. 绩效抑或专业: 我国社会工作评估的困境与对策[J]. 中州学刊, 2015(1): 73-78
[11] 徐双敏, 崔丹丹. 完善社会组织第三方评估工作机制研究——基于5市调查数据的分析[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2016(6): 52-57
[12] 顾江霞. 独立与依附: 社会工作服务评估的价值观反思——基于H市两个社会评估项目的案例研究[J]. 招标与投标, 2014(3): 41-46
[13] 广东省民政厅. 广东省社会工作十年发展报告[EB/OL]. [2016-11-07]. Http//:mzzt.mca.gov.cn/artide/sggzzsn/jlcl/201611/20161100887284.shtml.
[14] 广州市社会工作协会. 广州市家综评估社会观察员培训启动26人获颁聘书[EB/OL]. [2015-09-06].
[15] LEON H GINSBERG. 社会工作评估: 原理与方法[M]. 黄晨曦, 译. 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2013, 31.
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[7] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[8] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[9] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[10] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[11] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[12] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
[13] YANG Hong, CHEN Tao. Multi-Stakeholders Collaboration and Village Governance Supported by Social Work Backbone: Research on the Governance Model of Z Village in Beijing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 80-91.
[14] HE Xuesong, WANG Tianqi. 2021 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 5-15.
[15] HE Jian, LAN Caiguang. Help Others by Mutual Assistance VS. Help Others to Self-Reliance: A New Interpretation of the Localization of Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 16-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!