第三空间视域下的科幻小说

社会工作与管理 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 92-95,100.

第三空间视域下的科幻小说

雷碧乐

广东工业大学外国语学院, 广东广州, 510006

收稿日期:2017-01-14 出版日期:2019-03-15 发布日期:2019-03-18
作者简介:雷碧乐,(1978-),女,汉族,讲师,博士研究生;主要研究方向:比较文化。
基金资助:
广东省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划项目外语专项“菲利普·迪克科幻小说中的后人类主义研究”（GD18WZX29）。

Science Fiction from the Perspective of Thirdspace Theory

LEI Bile

School of Foreign Languages, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China

Received:2017-01-14 Online:2019-03-15 Published:2019-03-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 用索亚的第三空间理论来剖析文学内部的空间地图，在空间本体论的基础上展开了一个动态的、矛盾的、异质的文学实践空间，它不单解构了传统文学的镜像本质，也打破了高雅文学和通俗文学的界限。通过真实和想象的乌托邦第三空间，陌生化和认知建构的差异和反抗的第三空间中，科幻小说在不断开拓科学思想边界的同时，兼具了与主流文学一样的功能，对人类生存的困境进行探索，对社会进行了审视和批判。

关键词: 第三空间, 空间本体论, 乌托邦, 陌生化和认知, 科幻小说

Abstract: The Thirdspace Theory of Edward Soja exposes a dynamic, contradicting and heterogeneous space when used to analyze the real picture of literature. Grounded on the nature of spatial ontology, not only does the theory deconstruct the reflection nature of literature, but also breaks the boundary between the classical and popular literature. In a Utopian space combined with reality and imagination, through the effect of estrangement and cognition, science fictions play the same role as the mainstream literary works by exploring the living conditions of human beings and making reflective judgments of social reality.

Key words: Thirdspace Theory, spatial ontology, Utopia, estrangement and cognition, science fiction

中图分类号:

IO-05

雷碧乐. 第三空间视域下的科幻小说[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019, 19(2): 92-95,100.

LEI Bile. Science Fiction from the Perspective of Thirdspace Theory[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(2): 92-95,100.

参考文献

[1] LEFEBVRE H. The production of space[M]. donald nicholson-smith trans. London:Blackwell, 1991:38-40.
[2] SOJA E. Thirdspace:journey to los angeles and other real and imagined places[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1996.
[3] 菲利普·E·韦格纳. 21世纪批评评介[M]. 张琼, 张冲, 译.南京:南京大学出版社, 2009.
[4] 张进. 文学理论通论[M]. 北京:人民出版社, 2014:46.
[5] 王德威. 落地的麦子不死:张爱玲与"张派"传人[M]. 济南:山东画报出版社, 2004:20-32.
[6] KUMAR K. Utopia and anti-utopia in modern times[M]. New York:Basil blackwell Ltd., 1987:23-24.
[7] MORGAN−RUSSELL S. St. Thomas more's utopia and the description of Britain[J]. Cahiers elisabethains, 2002(4):2.
[8] JAMESON F. Archaeologies of the future[M]. New York:Verso, 2005:XIV, 267.
[9] 王逢振. 外国科幻论文精选[M]. 重庆:重庆出版社, 2008:130.
[10] URSULA K, GUIN L. The left hand of darkness[M]. New York:AceBooks, 2000:47.
[11] 弗列德里克·詹姆逊. "全球化与赛博朋客"[N]. 陈永国, 译. 文艺报, 2004-07-15.
[12] DARKO S Metamorphoses of Science Fiction:Onthe Poetics and history of a literary genre[M].New havenCT & London:yale university press, 1979.
[13] GIBSON W. Neuromancer[M]. London:Harper collins, 1984:67.
[14] 瓦尔特·本雅明. 经验与贫乏[M]. 王炳均, 杨劲, 译. 天津:百花文艺出版社, 1999:287.
[15] JAMESON, Frederic. Progress versus utopia; or, can we imagine the f[J]. Science fiction studies, 1982(1):19.
[16] 吴岩. 科幻文学论纲[M]. 重庆:重庆出版社, 2011:35.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed