社会工作与管理 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5): 12-19.

• 社会工作 • 上一篇    下一篇

专业关系与朋友关系:一项社会工作历史视角的知识观考察

童敏1, 辛峻青1, 骆成俊2   

  1. 1. 厦门大学公共事务学院, 福建 厦门, 361005;
    2. 深圳市南山区慢性病防治院, 广东 深圳, 518000
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-16 出版日期:2019-09-15 发布日期:2019-09-23
  • 作者简介:童敏(1965-),男,汉族,教授,博士;主要研究方向:精神健康社会工作,健康社会工作,社会工作理论和伦理价值,中国文化与社会工作研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目“新时代的场景实践与中国社会工作本土化理论体系建设”(18BSH151)。

Professional Relationship or Friendship: A Research of Knowledge View from the Historical Perspective of Social Work

TONG Min1, XIN Junqing1, LUO Chengjun2   

  1. 1. School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China;
    2. Shenzhen Nanshan Hospital of Chronic Disease Prevention and Treatment, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
  • Received:2019-01-16 Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-09-23

摘要: 经历快速发展的10年之后,中国本土社会工作正面临严峻挑战:一方面需要通过专业关系的建立推进专业服务;另一方面在生活场景中又无法摆脱朋友关系的影响,导致“双重关系”成为专业化发展的瓶颈。通过对西方社会工作专业关系的历史回顾和知识观考察发现:西方社会工作的专业关系经历了明确清晰的个案工作专业关系期、含混不清的“双重关系”期以及朋友式的专业关系期3个阶段,同样也面临“双重关系”的挑战;西方社会工作“双重关系”的处理,以明确的专业身份和完善的专业服务系统为前提,以专业关系为主导,依据实证理性的“专家”知识观;中国本土社会工作既缺乏明确的专业身份,也缺乏完善的专业服务系统,需要以朋友关系为主导,采取场景实践的知识观。研究结果将有利于中国本土社会工作者明确自身的专业处境和未来的发展方向。

关键词: 专业关系, 双重关系, 社会工作

Abstract: With a decade of rapid development, there are still arduous challenges in social work of China. On the one hand, it is indispensable to promote professional services through the establishment of professional relationship. On the other hand, "dual relationship" gradually becomes the bottleneck of professional development in social work because it is impossible to get rid of friend-like relationship in the practice context. This paper, based on the historical review and investigation of the concept of professional relationship in western social work, found that:first, there are three phases in the development of professional relationship in western social work, including the clear professional relationship period of casework, the ambiguous dual relationship period and the friend-like professional relationship period. Meanwhile, they are facing the challenge of dual relationship; second, with clear professional identity and sound developed professional service system, the handle of "dual relationship" in the west is guided by professional relationship and based on the "expert" knowledge view of positivism and rationalism. Third, lacking clear professional identity and sound developed professional service system, Chinese local social work requires a friend-oriented professional relationship and the knowledge view of context practice. The findings of this research would help Chinese local social workers to identify themselves on their professional situation and clear direction for future development.

Key words: professional relationship, dual relationship, social work

中图分类号: 

  • C916
[1] 廖荣利. 社会工作学[M]. 台北:三民书局, 1985.
[2] HOWE D. A brief introduction to social work theory[M]. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[3] NASW code of ethics[M]. Washington DC:The National Association of Social Workers,1996:106.
[4] SMYTHE E, HENNESSY J, ABBOTT M, et al. Do professional boundaries limit trust?[J]. International journal of mental health nursing, 2017:287-295
[5] 区伟祥. 社会工作专业关系浅谈(上)[J]. 中国社会工作, 2017(16):63-63
[6] 孙晓薇. 社会工作专业关系之双重关系困境[J]. 品牌, 2014(7上):203
[7] 赵芳. 社会工作专业伦理中双重关系的限制、困境及其选择——一项基于城乡社会工作者的实证研究[J].中国社会工作研究. 2013(10):
[8] 迟宁宇. 社会工作专业关系中的伦理困境[J]. 现代交际:学术版, 2017(9):51-52
[9] 童敏. 中国本土社会工作发展的专业困境及其解决路径——一项历史和社会结构的考察[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2016(4):42-47
[10] HOWARD W. ODUM. An approach to public welfare and social work[M]. Chapel Hill, North Carolina:University of North Carolina Press, 1926.
[11] BRUNO F. The theory of social work[M]. Boston:D. C. Heath and Company, 1936.
[12] PRAY K. Social work in a revolutionary age[M]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1949:279.
[13] LEIGHNINGER L. Social work:search for identity[M].New York:Greenwood, 1987.
[14] PERLMAN HH, SYTZ F. Social casework:a problem-solving process[J]. Social Service Review, 1957:64-83
[15] BIESTEK FP. The casework relationship[M]. London:Unwin University Books, 1971.
[16] BIESTEK F P. An analysis of the casework relationship[J]. Families in Society the Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 1994(35):630-634
[17] M ELIZABETH. Casework relationship[D]. Chicago:Loyola University,1954:37-50.
[18] REYNOLDS B. Role of the psychiatric social worker[M]. New York:Institute for Child Guidance Series, 1931:68.
[19] APTEKAR H. Basic Concepts in Social Case Work[J]. American journal of sociology, 1941(16):563-566
[20] CADDIGAN A, POZZUTO R. Use of self in relational clinical social work[J]. Clinical social work journal, 2008(26):235-243
[21] KEMP SP, WHITTAKER JK, TRACY EM. Person-environment practice:the social ecology of interpersonal helping[M]. New York:Aldine de Gruyter, 1997.
[22] AUSTIN LM. Trends in differential treatment in social casework[J]. Social casework, 1948(29):203-211
[23] BARCLAY P. Social workers:their role and tasks[M]. London:Bedford Square Press, 1982.
[24] HADLEY R. A community social worker's handbook[M]. London:Tavistock Publications, 1987.
[25] SMALE G. Community social work:a paradigm for change[M]. London:National Institute for Social Work, 1988.
[26] KAGLE JD, GIEBELHAUSEN PN. Dual relationships and professional boundaries[J]. Social Work, 1994(39):213-220
[27] BROWNLEE K, TAYLOR S. CASW code of ethics and non-sexual dual relationships:the need for clarification[J]. Environmental information science, 1995(29):33-37
[28] STOCKMAN AF. Dual relationships in rural mental health practice:an ethical dilemma[J]. Journal of rural community psychology, 1990(11):31-45
[29] BROWNLEE K. The ethics of non-sexual dual relationships:a dilemma for the rural mental health professional[J]. Community mental health journal, 1996(32):497-503
[30] ABBOTT A. Understanding transference and countertransference[J]. Psychoanalytic social work, 2003(10):21-41
[31] REAMER FG. Boundary issues in social work:managing dual relationships[J]. Social work, 2003(48):121-133
[32] NASW code of ethics[M]. Washington DC:The National Association of Social Workers, 2018:10.
[33] GEYER MC. Dual role relationships and christian counseling[J]. Journal of psychology & theology, 1994:187-195
[34] GRIPTON J, VALENTICH M. Making decisions about non-sexual boundary behaviour[J]. Canadian social work, 2003:108-125
[35] LEVY C. Social work ethics[M]. New York:Human Sciences Press, 1976.
[36] HALVERSON G, BROWNLEE K. Managing ethical considerations around dual relationships in small rural and remote canadian communities[J]. International social work, 2010(53):247-260
[37] KITCHENER KS. Dual role relationships:what makes them so problematic?[J]. Journal of counseling and development, 1988(12):217
[38] GOTTLIEB MC. Avoiding exploitive dual relationships:a decision-making model[J]. Psychotherapy, 1993(30):41-48
[39] EBERT BW. Dual-relationship prohibitions:a concept whose time never should have come[J]. Applied & preventive psychology, 1997(6):137-156
[40] TOMM K. The Ethics of dual relationships[M]//LAZARUS. Dual relationships and psychotherapy, New York:Springer, Original work published 1991.
[41] CATALANO S. The challenges of clinical practice in small or rural communities:case studies in managing dual relationships in and outside of therapy[J]. Journal of contemporary psychotherapy, 1997(27):23-35
[42] MOLESKI SM, KISELICA MS. Dual relationships:a continuum ranging from the destructive to the therapeutic[J]. Journal of counseling & development, 2014(83):11
[43] PUGH R. Dual relationships:personal and professional boundaries in rural social work[J]. British journal of social work, 2007(37):1405-1423
[44] HILL MR, MAMALAKIS PM. Family therapists and religious communities:negotiating dual relationships[J]. Family relations, 2010(50):199-208
[45] SCHANK JA, SKOVHOLT TM. Dual-relationship dilemmas of rural and small-community psychologist[J]. Professional psychology research & practice, 1997(28):44-49
[46] GREEN R, LONNE B. Great lifestyle, pity about the job stress:occupational stress in rural human service practice[J]. Rural society, 2005(15):253-267
[47] RILEY A. Murder and social work[J]. Australian social work, 2008(49):37-43
[48] BOER CD, COADY N. Good helping relationships in child welfare:learning from stories of succes[J]. Child & family social work, 2010(12):32-42
[49] ALEXANDER C, CHARLES G. Caring, mutuality and reciprocity in social worker-client relationships:rethinking principles of practice[J]. Journal of social work, 2009(9):5-22
[50] WILES F. Blurring private-professional boundaries:does it matter? issues in researching social work students' perceptions about professional regulation[J]. Ethics & social welfare, 2011(5):36-51
[51] WEISS RS. Coping with loss:separation and other problems that threaten relationships[M]. London:British Medical Journal, 1998.
[52] DOEL M, ALLMARK P, CONWAY P, et al. Professional boundaries:crossing a line or entering the shadows?[J]. British journal of social work, 2010(40):1866-1889
[53] RIBNER DS, KNEIPAZ C. Client's view of a successful helping relationship[J]. Social work, 2002(47):379-387
[54] PARTON N, O'BYRNE P. What do we mean by constructive social work?[M]. University of Windsor School of Social Work, 2000.
[55] HEALY K. Social Work theories in context:creating frameworks for practice[M]. New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[56] GREEN R. Professional distance and social work:stretching the elastic?[J]. Australian social work, 2006(59):449-461
[57] RUCH G. Relationship-based practice and reflective practice:holistic approaches to contemporary child care social work[J]. Child and family social work, 2005(10):111-123
[58] O'LEARY P, TSUI MS, RUCH G. The boundaries of the social work relationship revisited:towards a connected, inclusive and dynamic conceptualisation[J]. British journal of social work, 2013(43):135-153
[59] CHONG HH. The understanding of indigenous peoples towards professional relationships:the case of taiwan[J]. International social work, 2016(59):235-245
[60] GOULD N. Mental health social work in context[M]. London:Routledge, 2009.
[61] ILLINGWORTH P. Faith:an untapped mental health nursing resource[J]. Mental health nursing, 2008(28):9-11
[62] HENNESSY J. The contribution of the mental health support worker to the mental health services in new zealand:an appreciative inquiry approach[d]. Auckland, New Zealand:Auckland University of Technology, 2015.
[63] FOOK J. Social work:critical theory and practice[M]. London:Sage, 2002.
[64] HICK S, POZZUTO R. Introduction:towards ‘becoming’ a critical social worker[M]//HICK S, FOOK J, POZZUTO R, Social work:a critical turn. Toronto:Thompson Educational Publishing, 2005:XⅡ.
[65] SCHÖN D. The reflective practitioner:how professionals think in action[M]. London:Temple Smith,1983.
[66] FOOK J. Social work:critical theory and practice[M]. London:Sage, 2002:13-14.
[67] PAYNE M, Modern social work theory (3rd ed.)[M]. New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2005:234.
[68] ROSSITER A. A perspective on critical social work[J]. Journal of progressive human services, 1996(7):23-41
[69] WEBB S, MCBEATH G. Post-critical social work analytics[M]//HICK S, FOOK J, POZZUTO R, Social work:a critical turn. Toronto:Thompson Educational Publishing, 2005:167.
[70] MCBEATH G, WEBB S. Social work, modernity and post modernity[J]. Sociological review, 1991(39):745-762
[1] 童敏, 吴宝红. 从英雄主义到平民关怀:社会工作伦理的反思与重构[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] 赵芳, 孔春燕. 基于“关系”的社会工作伦理实践[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] 何龙韬, 吴汉. 应对社会工作伦理困境的反思能力教学和培养模式[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] 秦海波, 李玉昆, 赵燕燕, 程海源. 提升薪资能否留住社会工作者?——工作自主权的调节作用[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] 金舒衡, 戴海静. 社区不文明行为与流动母亲的安全感——兼论社会工作的空间介入[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] 雷杰, 易雪娇, 张忠民. 行政化导向的新管理主义:乡镇 (街道)社会工作站建设与政府购买社会工作服务——以湖南省“禾计划”A市项目为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[7] 于铁山, 居正. 政治与专业互嵌:社会工作机构党建发展与服务进阶研究——以广东省D地27家社会工作机构为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[8] 文军, 敖淑凤. 从碎片化到整合化:志愿服务本土实践路径探索——以无锡市X区为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[9] 韩央迪, 黄翠萍, 张雪峰, 王琛迪, 李相蒲. “橙希”互助:循证导向下的癌患家属照顾者生活希望计划——以上海市H医院肿瘤内科为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[10] 赵迪, 张志鹏, 张伟. 因为专业所以认同——南京市社会工作者主观地位认同的质性研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[11] 陈蓓蓓. 分类视阈下社会工作机构公共危机应对研究——基于湖北省H市的调查[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[12] 时怡雯, 周静. 整合视角下我国少数民族留守儿童社会工作服务模式探究——基于云南省Y县少数民族留守儿童需求评估分析[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
[13] 杨红, 陈涛. 社会工作机构支撑的村庄多元主体协同治理——北京市Z村治理模式研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(3): 80-91.
[14] 何雪松, 王天齐. 2021年社会工作研究年度进展述评[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(2): 5-15.
[15] 何健, 蓝财广. 互助助人VS助人自助:中国社会工作本土化理念的新阐释[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(2): 16-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!