社会工作与管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 70-77.

• 社会政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会政策和经济进步

蒂特马斯, 马小婷1, 刘继同2   

  1. 英国伦敦政治经济学院,英国 伦敦; 1. 兰州大学第一医院医务处,甘肃 兰州,730000; 2. 北京大学公共卫生学院,北京,100191
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-11 出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2021-12-14
  • 通讯作者: 刘继同(1961—),男,民族,教授,博士;主要研究方向:中国社会福利制度与社会福利理论,社会政策与卫生政策,福利与卫生财政,医务社会工作,儿童福利与妇幼卫生服务政策。E-mail:frankliu2790@sina.com。 E-mail:frankliu2790@sina.com
  • 作者简介:蒂特马斯(Richard M.Titmuss)(1907—1973),男,原英国伦敦政治经济学院社会政策系主任,社会政策奠基人和社会福利哲学创始人;马小婷(1996—),女,汉族,硕士;主要研究方向:卫生政策,卫生财政学与社会医疗保险政策。
  • 基金资助:
    财政部与国家卫生健康委员会委托课题“我国卫生财政投入政策演进历程及其评价研究”;国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国特色现代儿童福利与家庭福利制度研究”(19BSH159)。

Social Policy and Economic Progress

Richard M.Titmuss, MA Xiaoting1, LIU Jitong2   

  1. The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; 1. Medical Affairs Office,The 1st Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000; 2. School of Public Health,Peking University, Beijing, 100191
  • Received:2021-01-11 Online:2021-11-15 Published:2021-12-14

摘要: 该文是英国和世界社会政策创始人与现代社会福利理论奠基人蒂特马斯的经典文献之一。在欧洲“福利国家”处于鼎盛和美国自由主义经济学家鼓吹福利私营化,尤其是在社会高度工业化、物质财富日益丰富、国家与社会变得日益富裕的背景下,作者从社会政策与经济发展的视角,聚焦政府在现代社会福利中的地位、功能、角色与作用议题,运用英国和美国社会发展的历史经验教训,围绕社会变迁带来的社会成本和诸多社会问题,如收入和财富不平等、耻辱污名、贫困、不自由、冲突暴力、负所得税和社会成本量化测量,深刻分析和彻底批判自由主义有关竞争性私人市场的若干假设,尤其是经济学中长期盛行的“乐观性的自动化模型”,总结和指出英美社会现存若干严重的思想认识误区,充分论证了“现代社会经济发展水平越高,越需要社会政策与福利国家制度,而且社会政策与福利国家制度发挥作用越大”的客观发展规律与基本方向,明确阐述经济政策与社会政策、经济增长与社会增长之间的互动关系,首次提出社会政策目标和社会发展方向是“由贫穷转变为不平等,由特定项目转变为整合社会权利,由经济增长转变为社会增长”的战略转型,历史意义深远。

关键词: 蒂特马斯福利哲学, 社会福利制度, 社会政策, 经济增长, 社会增长, 福利现代化

Abstract: This paper is one of the classic literature of Titmuss, the founder of social policy in Britoin and the world and the founder of modern sociol welfare theory. The “welfare state” was in its heyday in Europe and American liberal economists advocated the privatization of welfare. Against the background of highly industrialized society, increasingly rich material wealth, and prosperous country and society,the author focused on the status, function, role and role of the government in modern social welfare from the perspective of social policy and economic development. Using the historical experience and lessons of social development in the United Kingdom and the United States, the author focused on the social cost and many social problems brought about by social change, such as income and wealth inequality, shame, stigma, poverty, non-freedom, violent conflict, negative income tax and the quantitative measurement of social costs, deeply analyzed and thoroughly criticized a number of assumptions about competitive private markets from the liberalism, especially the long-term prevailing economics automation model of “optimism”, summarized and pointed out some serious misunderstanding on existing British and American thoughts. It fully demonstrated the objective development law and basic direction that “the higher the level of modern social and economic development is, the more social policy and welfare state system is needed, and the greater the role of social policy and welfare state system is”, and clearly expounded the interactive relationship between economic policy and social policy, economic growth and social growth.For the first time, it put forward the strategic transformation of “from poverty to inequality, from specific projects to integration of social rights, and from economic growth to social growth”, which is of far-reaching historical significance.

Key words: Titmuss’s philosophy of welfare, social welfare system, social policy, economic growth, social growth, welfare modernization

中图分类号: 

  • C916
[1] FRIEDMAN M. Capitalism and Freedom[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
[2] LEES D S. Health through choice[M]//R HARRIS. Freedom or Free-for-all?. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs, 1965.
[3] WEST E G. Education and the state[M]. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs, 1965.
[4] GOSLIN D A. The Search for ability[M]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1965: 13.
[5] GROSS B M. The social state of the union[J]. Trans-Action, 1965, 3(1): 15
[6] MOORE W E. Social change[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
[7] MORGENSTERN O. On the accuracy of economic observation[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.
[8] TITMUSS R M. Income distribution and social change[M]. London: Allen & Unwin, 1962.
[9] GOFFMAN E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
[10] MILLER S M. Urban education and culture deprivation[M]. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 1965.
[11] CLOWARD R A. Social problems, social definitions and social opportunities: national council on crime and delinquency[C]. New York, 1963.
[12] TITMUSS R M. The ethics and economics of medical care[J]. Medical Care, 1963, 1(1): 16-22
[13] MILLER H T. Is the income gap closed? “NO”[N]. New York Times Magazine, 1962-11-11.
[14] BELL D. The end of ideology: on the exhaustion of political ideas in the fifties[M]. New York: Collier Books, 1961.
[15] ORSHANSKY M. Children of the poor[J]. Social Security Bulletin, 1963, 26(7): 3-13
[16] ORSHANSKY M. Counting the poor: another look at the poverty profile[J]. Social Aecurity Bulletin, 1965, 28(1): 1-29
[17] ORSHANSKY M. Who’s who among the poor: a demographic view of poverty[J]. Social Aecurity Bulletin, 1965, 28(7): 13-32
[18] BRADY D S. Age and the income distribution[N]. Research Report, Social Security Administration, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1965-01-01.
[19] MILLER S M A R. Social problems[M]. New York: John Wiley, 1967.
[20] HUNTER D R. The slums: challenge and response[M]. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.
[21] GANS H. The urban villagers[M]. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1962.
[22] TAEUBER K E. Residential segregation[J]. Scientific American, 1965(213): 12
[23] TAEUBER K E A T. Negroes in cities: residential segregation and neighborhood change[M]. Chicago: Aldine, 1965.
[24] OFFICE OF POLICY PLANNING AND RESEARCH US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. The negro family: the case for national action[M]. Washington, DC: US Department of State, 1965.
[25] ABEL-SMITH B A T P. The poor and the poorest[M]. London: Bell and sons, 1965.
[26] NICHOLSON J L. Redistribution of income in the United Kingdom[M]. London: Bowes and Bowes, 1965.
[27] REVELL J R S. Changes in the social distribution of property in Britain during the twentieth century[C]. Proceedings of the Third International Economic History Conference, 1965.
[28] MOSER C A. Inequalities in educational opportunities[M]. London: London School of Economics, 1965.
[29] Paper W. Immigration from the commonwealth[M]. London: London School of Economics, 1965.
[30] HUGHES E C. Race relations and the sociological imagination[J]. American Sociological Review, 1963(28): 879-890
[1] 李兵, 昌硕. 社会政策问题的情境主义框架:政治性、情境互动与元治理[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(3): 92-100.
[2] 蒂特马斯, 李惠宇, 刘继同. 选择和“福利国家”[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(6): 78-84.
[3] 蒂特马斯, 柯洋华, 马小婷, 刘继同. 福利国家和福利社会[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(6): 85-92.
[4] 臧雷振, 陈诺. 社会政策学科发展:国际进展及中国前瞻[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(2): 85-94.
[5] 方巍, 王宇婷. 循证实践及其对新时代社会政策建设与研究的启示[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019, 19(3): 89-95.
[6] 彭灵灵.
社会协同:制度性社会发展策略的路径选择        
[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2015, 15(3): 45-50.
[7] 叶少霞,杨柳菁. 基于经济增长理论探析财政科研投入模式[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2014, 14(4): 86-.
[8] 向德平, 刘欣. 构建多元化反贫困政策:农村低保与扶贫开发政策的有效衔接[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2014, 14(3): 54-61.
[9] 林卡1 , 王卓祺2著, 安超颖1译. 从演化的角度阐释东亚社会政策及其社会体系的变化[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2014, 14(3): 62-69.
[10] 关信平. 朝向更加公平、平等和高效的社会政策——对我国社会政策公平性的理论思考[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2013, 13(3): 5-10.
[11] 方巍. 发展型社会政策:理论、渊源、实践及启示[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2013, 13(1): 5-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!