选择和“福利国家”

社会工作与管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 78-84.

选择和“福利国家”

蒂特马斯, 李惠宇¹, 刘继同²

英国伦敦政治经济学院，英国伦敦; 1. 中国劳动关系学院社会工作学院，北京，100048; 2. 北京大学公共卫生学院，北京，100191

收稿日期:2021-01-11 出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2021-12-14
通讯作者: 刘继同(1961—)，男，汉族，教授，博士；主要研究方向：中国社会福利制度与社会福利理论，社会政策与卫生政策，福利与卫生财政，医务社会工作，儿童福利与妇幼卫生服务政策。E-mail：frankliu2790@sina.com。 E-mail:1203615745@qq.com;frankliu2790@sina.com
作者简介:蒂特马斯(Richard M. Titmuss)(1907—1973年)，男，原英国伦敦政治经济学院社会政策系主任，社会政策奠基人和社会福利哲学创始人;李惠宇(1992—)，女，汉族，助教，硕士；主要研究方向：社会工作理论和实务，医务社会工作。
基金资助:
财政部与国家卫生健康委员会委托课题“我国卫生财政投入政策演进历程及其评价研究”；国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国特色现代儿童福利与家庭福利制度研究”(19BSH159)；民政部委托课题“中国现代家庭养老服务政策支持研究”。

Choice and the “Welfare State”

Richard M.Titmuss, LI Huiyu¹, LIU Jitong²

The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; 1. School of Social Work, China University of Labor Relations, Beijing, 100048; 2. School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100091

Received:2021-01-11 Online:2021-11-15 Published:2021-12-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 该文^①是英国和世界社会政策创始人与现代社会福利理论奠基人蒂特马斯的经典文献之一。作者针对英美社会福利私营化与市场化的现实状况，尤其是以弗里德曼为代表的自由主义经济学的四个潜在假设，从社会福利理论与社会政策角度出发，主要介绍私营养老金与医疗照顾服务这两个领域的典型案例，以选择自由和所谓“福利国家”增进人们的选择为主题，全面、深刻、系统、历史地批判了社会保障、社会福利私营化与市场化的诸多弊端和明显社会局限性，大力弘扬社会公正价值观，高举福利理论旗帜，福利哲学思想深刻。该文的主要观点对当今中国的社会发展具有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 蒂特马斯, 福利国家, 福利私营化, 社会政策, 福利制度

Abstract: This paper is one of the classic literature of Titmuss, the founder of social policy in Britain and the world and the founder of modern social welfare theory. In reference to the reality of American and British social welfare privatization and marketization, especially the four underlying assumptions of liberal economicsrepresented by Friedman, the author from the perspective of social welfare theory and social policy, mainly used two typical casesof the private pension and medical care service. Taking free choice and the so-called “welfare state” to improve people’s choices as the theme, the author comprehensively, profoundly, systematically and historically criticizes the disadvantages and obvious social limitations of the privatization and marketization of social security and social welfare, vigorously promotes the values of social justice, holds high the banner of welfare theory, and has profound thoughts, which is one of the classics of welfare philosophy. The main viewpoints of this paper have certain reference signifcane to the social development of China today.

Key words: Titmuss, welfare state, welfare privatization, social policy, welfare system

中图分类号:

C916

蒂特马斯, 李惠宇, 刘继同. 选择和“福利国家”[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(6): 78-84.

Richard M.Titmuss, LI Huiyu, LIU Jitong. Choice and the “Welfare State”[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(6): 78-84.

参考文献

[1] ABLE-SMITH. Fabian tract[M]. London: Fabian, 1970.
[2] MILTON FRIEDMAN. Capitalism and freedom[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago, 1962.
[3] LEES D S. Health through choice[M]//R HARRIS. Freedom or free-for-all?. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs, 1965.
[4] ABEL-SMITH B A T P. The poor and the poorest[M]. London: Bell and Sons, 1965.
[5] M RICHARD. The poorhouse state the American way of life on public assistance[M]. New York: Pantheon Books, 1966.
[6] MILLER H T. Is the income gap closed? “NO”[N]. New York times magazine, 1962-11-11.
[7] BELL D. The end of ideology: on the exhaustion of political ideas in the fifties[M]. New York: Collier Books, 1961.
[8] ORSHANSK Y M. Children of the poor[J]. Social security bulletin, 1963, 26(7): 3-13
[9] BRADY D S. Age and the income distribution[N]. Research Report, Social Security Administration, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1965-01-01.
[10] HUNTER D R. The slums: challenge and response[M]. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.
[11] OFFICE OF POLICY PLANNING AND RESEARCH US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. The negro family: the case for national action[M]. Washington, DC: US Department of State, 1965.
[12] GOFFMAN E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
[13] MENCIUS S. Private practice and the national health service[C]. London: Occasional Papers on Social Administration, 1967: 24.
[14] ARTHUR SELDON. What kind of social welfare[M]. London: Lloyds Bank Review, 1966.
[15] SELDON A. Pensions in a free society[C]. London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1957.
[16] LIFE OFFICES’ ASSOCIATION. The pension problem: a statement of the labour party’s proposals[M]. London: British Medical Journal, 1957: 3.
[17] NURSAW W G. Principles of pension fund investment[M]. London: Hutchinson, 1966: 19.
[18] THE GOVERMENT ACTUARY. Occupational pension schemes: a new survey[M]. London: HMSO, 1966.
[19] KAHN H R. Repercussions of redundancy[M]. London: Allen & Unwin, 1965.
[20] M JEFFERYS, R TITMUSS. Commitment to welfare[M]. London: British Journal of Sociology, 1968.
[21] KENNETH ARROW. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care[J]. The American Economic Review, 1963, 53(5): 851-883

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed