打造落脚社区：流动人口社区融入中的共同生产——以广州市 G 机构“新家园”项目为例

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在快速城镇化背景下，流动人口的城市落脚与社区融入已成为基层治理的重要议题。文章以广州市 G 机构在 L村(城中村)实施的“新家园”项目为例，基于共同生产理论，采用质性研究方法，通过参与式观察与深度访谈来探讨落脚社区的形成机制。研究发现，落脚社区并非单纯地承载服务空间，而是通过社会组织的介入与多元主体的协同参与，在“倡议—响应—推动—扩散”的互动过程中逐步建构起来。社会组织在其中发挥联结与催化作用，通过激发居民参与、整合多元资源与重构关系网络，促进流动人口从被动接受到主动共建的转变。研究表明，共同生产为理解流动人口落脚社区的生成逻辑与治理模式提供了新的分析视角，也为城中村地区的社会整合与公共服务创新提供了经验启示。

关键词: 流动人口, 落脚社区, 共同生产

Abstract: Against the backdrop of rapid urbanization, the urban settlement and community integration of the migrant population have become critical challenges in grassroots governance. This study examines the New Home Project implemented by Organization G in L Urban Village, Guangzhou, as a case study. Drawing on co-production theory and employing qualitative research methods--including participatory observation and in-depth interviews--the study investigates the formation mechanisms of settlement communities. The findings indicate that settlement communities are not merely passive service-delivery spaces; rather, they are dynamically constructed through the intervention of social organizations and the collaborative participation of multiple stakeholders. This process unfolds through an interactive sequence of advocacy, response, facilitation, and diffusion. Social organizations serve as intermediaries and catalysts, fostering resident engagement, integrating heterogeneous resources, and reconstructing social networks. In doing so, they facilitate a transformative shift among the migrant population: from passive service recipients to active community co-creators. This study demonstrates that the co-production framework provides a valuable analytical lens for understanding the generative dynamics and governance models underlying the emergence of settlement communities. Furthermore, it offers empirical implications for promoting social integration and innovating public service delivery in urban village contexts.

Key words: floating population, settling community, co-production

中图分类号:

C916

张晓红, 何旺洋. 打造落脚社区：流动人口社区融入中的共同生产——以广州市 G 机构“新家园”项目为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2026, 26(4): 73-84.

ZHANG Xiaohong, HE Wangyang. Constructing a Settlement Community: Co-Production in the Social Integration of Migrant Populations, a Case Study of the New Home Project by Organization G in Guangzhou[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2026, 26(4): 73-84.

参考文献

[1] 国家统计局. 第七次全国人口普查公报(第七号)[EB/OL]. (2023-02-06). https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/202302/t20230206_1902007.html.
[2] 吴瑞君, 曾明星. 人口迁移流动对城乡社会发展的影响[J]. 人民论坛, 2013(11): 10-12
[3] 李亭亭, 朱宇, 林李月, 等. 中国人口家庭化流动模式变迁: “延续”还是“突变”[J]. 地理科学进展, 2024(8): 1513-1524
[4] 道格·桑德斯. 落脚城市: 最后的人类大迁移与我们的未来[M]. 陈信宏, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2012.
[5] Mckenzie R D. The ecological approach to the study of the human community[J]. American journal of sociology, 1924, 30(3): 287-301
[6] Burgess E. The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project[M]//Park R E, Burgers E W, MCKENZIE R D. The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1925: 47-62.
[7] Thomsa W I, Znaniecki F. The Polish peasant in Europe and America: a classic work in immigration history[M]. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1996: 98.
[8] Hull House. History: Jane Addams Hull House[EB/OL]. [2025-03-20]. https://janeaddamshullhouse.org/history/.
[9] Wilson K L, Portes A. Immigrant enclaves: an analysis of the labor market experiences of Cubans in Miami[J]. American journal of sociology, 1980, 86(2): 295-319
[10] 王春光. 农村流动人口的“半城市化”问题研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2006(5): 107-122, 244
[11] 项飚. 社区何为——对北京流动人口聚居区的研究[J]. 社会学研究, 1998(6): 54-62
[12] 高云红, 尹海洁. 多元社区视野下的旧城空间——以H市一个流动人口社区为例[J]. 社会发展研究, 2017(1): 56-72, 243
[13] 聂伟. 落脚城市: 接纳、迁移与融入[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2024: 110-128.
[14] 万向东, 王亚飞, 郜宪达. 从“落脚城市”到“落脚社区”——移民和城中村研究的启示与外来人口城市融合服务的基本策略[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2016(4): 56-62
[15] 张江龙, 谭祖雪, 章晓. 空间理论视域下农民工社会融合实践研究——以“外来者”聚居区福村为例[J]. 学习与探索, 2017(9): 84-93
[16] Ostrom E. Crossing the great divide: co-production, synergy, and development[J]. World development, 1996, 24(6): 1073-1087
[17] Osborne S, Radnor Z, Strokosch K. Co-Production and the co-creation of value[J]. Public management review, 2016, 18(5): 639-653
[18] 张云翔. 公共服务的共同生产: 文献综述及其启示[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2018(5): 31-45, 126
[19] 朱春奎, 易雯. 公共服务合作生产研究进展与展望[J]. 公共行政评论, 2017(5): 188-201, 220
[20] Fledderus J, Brandsen T, Honingh M. Restoring trust through the co-production of public services: a theoretical elaboration[J]. Public management review, 2014, 16(3): 424-443
[21] 曹海军, 王梦. 社区公共安全合作生产的行动逻辑与实现机制——基于Y市“零纠纷”建设的案例分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2023(10): 149-157
[22] 侯志阳. 脱域共同生产: 村民参与乡村智慧医疗卫生服务治理的个案研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021(3): 54-61
[23] 吴宝家, 唐银彬. 合作生产赋能农村环境公共服务有效供给的机制探讨——基于四川省D镇巷道环境整治的案例研究[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(5): 95-105
[24] 王学军. 公共价值视角下的公共服务合作生产: 回顾与前瞻[J]. 南京社会科学, 2020(2): 59-66, 94
[25] 张绪娥, 温锋华, 唐正霞. 由合作生产到价值共创的社区更新何以可行?——以北京“劲松模式”为例[J]. 公共管理学报, 2023(1): 144-156, 175-176
[26] 刘乃全, 宇畅, 赵海涛. 流动人口城市公共服务获取与居留意愿——基于长三角地区的实证分析[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2017(6): 112-121
[27] 韩志明. 国家治理技术的演进逻辑——以流动人口管控实践为例[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(5): 106-116
[28] 尹海洁, 高云红. 流动与固定的悖论: 城市流动人口的生存困境——以H市繁华小区的流动人口为例[J]. 社会科学战线, 2015(12): 180-191
[29] 蒋红军, 张东. 调适性赋权: 流动人口社区融入何以可能?[J]. 公共行政评论, 2024(6): 60-77, 197
[30] 容志, 张云翔. 社区微更新中政社共同生产的类型与生成逻辑——基于上海市Y社区的实践案例分析[J]. 探索, 2020(3): 127-141
[31] 柳红霞, 张平平. 空间化引领: 党建引领社区治理的新形态——基于D区党群服务中心建设的案例研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025(4): 50-62
[32] Loeffler E, Hine-hughes F. Five steps to making the transformation to co-production[M]// LOEFFLER E, Power G, Bovaird T, et al. Co-production of health and wellbeing in Scotland, Birmingham: Governance International, 2013: 132-137.
[33] Putnam R D. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital[J]. Journal of democracy, 1995, 6(1): 65-78
[34] Arnstein S R. A ladder of citizen participation[J]. Journal of the American institute of planners, 1969, 35(4): 216-224
[35] Bovaird T. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services[J]. Public administration review, 2007, 67(5): 846-860
[36] Cornwall A. Women’s empowerment: what works? [J] Journal of international development, 2016, 28: 342–359.
[37] Dovidio J F, Gaertner S L, Kawakami K. Intergroup contact: the past, present, and the future[J]. Group processes & intergroup relations, 2003, 6: 5-21
[38] Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. in handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education[M]. New York: Greenwood Press, 1986: 241-258.
[39] 王清. 项目制与社会组织服务供给困境: 对政府购买服务项目化运作的分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(4): 59-65
[40] Stephen P. Osborne, from public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation?[J]. Public management review, 2018, 20(2): 225-231
[41] Pestoff V. Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: some crucial conceptual issues[M]//Pestoff V. New public governance, the third sector, and co-production. New York: Routledge, 2013: 31-52.
[42] 高万红. 增能视角下的流动人口社会工作实践探索——以昆明Y社区流动人口社区综合服务实践为例[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版)[J]. 2011(1): 30-36
[43] 潘莉, 孙洁, 王晔安. 合作生产视角下乡镇社会工作站促建社区韧性的机制研究——以望城“禾计划”项目为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022(4): 75-85, 100
[44] 侯利文, 文军. 科层为体、自治为用: 居委会主动行政化的内生逻辑——以苏南地区宜街为例[J]. 社会学研究, 2022(1): 136-155, 229
[45] Bovaird T, Van Ryzin G G, Loeffler E, et al. Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services[J]. Journal of social policy, 2015, 44(1): 1-23
[46] Carla A, Grant C. Caring, mutuality and reciprocity in social worker: client relationships[J]. Journal of social work, 2009, 9(1): 5-22
[47] 张和清, 廖其能. 乡镇(街道)专业社会工作发展中互为主体性建构研究——以广东“双百计划”为例[J]. 社会工作, 2020(5): 30-34
[48] Brandsen T, Honingh M. Distinguishing different types of coproduction: a conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions[J]. Public administration review, 2016, 76: 427-435
[49] Alford J. Engaging public sector clients: from service-delivery to co-production[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009: 205-214.
[50] Voorberg W H, Bekkers V J J M, Tummers L G. A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey[J]. Public management review, 2015, 17(9): 1333-1357
[51] Ostrom E. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems[J]. American economic review, 2010, 100(3): 641-672

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed