社会工作与管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4): 71-77.

• 社会政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

全面二孩下的社会体制建设——生育2.0时代下如何释放生育力量

杨华磊   

  1. 中国农业大学经济管理学院, 北京, 100083
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-13 出版日期:2017-07-15 发布日期:2017-07-12
  • 作者简介:杨华磊(1986—),男,汉族,在读博士生;主要研究方向:人口社会与劳动经济。

Social System Construction against the Background of Unlimited Two-Child Policy: How to Release Fertility in the Fertility 2.0 Era

YANG Hualei   

  1. School of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China
  • Received:2016-06-13 Online:2017-07-15 Published:2017-07-12

摘要: 在全面放开二孩的背景下,社会养老和储蓄养老会使家庭中生育和养老的脱节,使得家庭生育行为在社会养老上具有正外部性。所以为释放生育力量,要么把养老和家庭生育挂钩,回归家庭子女养老;要么对丁克、单身以及低于社会生育水平的家庭征收老年时候的社会赡养费,并把赡养费用于补贴多生育子女的家庭。2015年至2030年间,中国最大婴儿潮世代60后将陆续退休,由于老龄化社会里赡养老人会对生育资源造成挤占,为了给中国再次制造人口红利,需要出台相应的延迟退休政策,推迟养老潮的到来,释放生育力量;同时为进一步避免老龄化社会养老对生育资源的挤占,发放养老金不如发放养老产品,通过建立养老院,改变传统散养模式,集中供养老人,降低养老成本,达到进一步释放生育资源的目的;最后,在老龄化的社会里,在不削减养老资源,不降低孩子素质以及不降低产出的情况下,年轻人只有通过节欲,才能达到释放生育力量的目的。

关键词: 生育2.0, 公共品, 丁克税, 延迟退休

Abstract: Against the background of unlimited two-child policy, fertility behaviors in families show positive externalities in social security, since fertility gets irrelevant with pension as a result of pension from social security and personal savings. In order to release fertility, it is imperative to correlate pension with family fertility to return to the form of caring for the elderly by children in family, or impose social alimony for the old age on Dink, low birthrate and single families, and take the alimony to subsidize families with more children. In the time span between 2015 and 2030, baby-boomers in the 1960s will start to retire. Since caring for the elderly in an aging society will occupy fertility resources, it is necessary to put off the retirement age for people born in the 1960s, so as to postpone the tide of retirement and pension and release fertility, for the sake of generating demographic dividends. To further avoid further occupancy of fertility resources by pension system in an aging society, it raises the suggestion that it should be better to offer pension products than offering pension. Through establishing nursing homes, it will transform the traditional care for the elderly in a dispersed way to collective support, to reduce the cost of caring for the elderly and realize the purpose of releasing fertility. In the end, in the premise of no cut on pension resources, no lowering the children's quality and no decrease in output, young people should strive to create a social culture of abstinence.

Key words: fertility2.0 era, public good, DINK Family fertility behavior tax, delay retirement, geracomium

中图分类号: 

  • C916
[1] 蔡昉. "中等收入陷阱"的理论、经验与针对性[J]. 经济学动态, 2011(12):4-9.
[2] 杨华磊, 周晓波. 中日人口世代更替对宏观经济趋势性特征的影响及其启示[J]. 社会科学研究, 2015(5):65-72.
[3] BECKER G S, LEWIS H G. On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children[J]. Developmental biology, 1973, 81(2):279-288.
[4] BECKER G S, TOMES N. Child Endowments and the Quantity and Quality of Children[J]. Nber Working Papers, 1976, 84(4):S143-S162.
[5] MURTHI M. Fertility change in Asia and Africa[J]. World development, 2002, 30(10):1769-1778.
[6] MISHRA V, SMYTH R. Female labor force participation and total fertility rates in the OECD:New evidence from panel cointegration and Granger causality testing[J]. Journal of economics & business, 2010, 62(1):48-64.
[7] 李小平. 外部性与过度生育——关于过剩人口成因的制度分析[J]. 中国人口科学, 2000(6):18-28.
[8] GROEZEN B V, LEERS T, MEIJDAM L. Social security and endogenous fertility:pensions and child allowances as siamese twins[J]. Journal of public economics, 2003, 87(2):233-251.
[9] SCHOONBROODT A, TERTILT M. Property rights and efficiency in OLG models with endogenous fertility[J]. Journal of economic theory, 2014, 150(1):551-582.
[10] BECKER G S, BARRO R J. A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility[J]. Quarterly journal of economics, 1988, 103(1):1-25.
[11] ROSATI F C. Social security in a non-altruistic model with uncertainty and endogenous fertility[J]. Journal of public economics, 1996, 60(2):283-294.
[12] CIGNO A, ROSTI F C. Jointly determined saving and fertility behaviour:Theory, and estimates for Germany, Italy, UK and USA[J]. European economic review, 1996, 40(8):1561-1589.
[13] 张川川, 陈斌开. 社会养老能否替代家庭养老——来自中国新型农村社会养老保险的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2014(11):102-115.
[14] 田钰燕. 我国老年残疾人机构养老服务体系探索[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2015(4):74-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!