社会工作与管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5): 67-77.

• 社会政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

儿童保护政策分析及以家庭为中心的儿童保护体系建构

赵芳1, 徐艳枫2, 陈虹霖1   

  1. 1. 复旦大学社会工作学系, 上海, 200433;
    2. 美国马里兰大学社会工作学院, 巴尔的摩, 21201
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-01 出版日期:2018-09-15 发布日期:2018-09-27
  • 作者简介:赵芳(1971-),女,汉族,教授,博士;主要研究方向:社会工作伦理,医务社会工作。

Analysis of Children Protection Policy and Construction of Family-centered Children Protection System

ZHAO Fang1, XU Yanfeng2, CHEN Honglin1   

  1. 1. Social Work Department, Fudan university, Shanghai, 200433, China;
    2. School of Social Work, Maryland University, Biltmore, 21201, America
  • Received:2018-01-01 Online:2018-09-15 Published:2018-09-27

摘要: 中国的儿童保护问题深受儒家文化影响,特别强调家庭的保护责任。新中国建立后,中国的儿童保护政策受到社会政治制度的深刻影响,建立起补缺型的儿童福利政策,政府对家庭少有支持。改革开放后,儿童福利政策从补缺型逐步向适度普惠型转变。近年来,儿童保护强制报告制度、替代性照顾制度的法律设定,监护权转移的司法实践以及民间非营利组织的积极参与,促成了中国儿童保护政策和实践的迅速发展。但目前中国的儿童保护仍然面临一系列问题:没有权威系统的儿童保护法(或儿童福利法),缺乏国家授权的权威部门主导,受中国传统文化影响在具体实施时公权力较难介入家庭私域,强制报告和替代性照顾制度没有具体的落实和跟进,国家行政权力与民间机构的力量缺乏协调整合等,制约了儿童保护政策的进一步发展。构建以家庭为中心的儿童保护政策,从结构性要素和技术性要素两方面全面推进儿童保护政策的发展,是中国儿童保护体系建构的重要途径。

关键词: 儿童保护, 政策分析, 体系建构

Abstract: Children protection in China, deeply influenced by Confucian culture, lays special emphasis on the responsibility of family protection. After the establishment of the People's Republic of China, children protection policy was deeply influenced by the social and political system. The compensatory children welfare policy system was set up, giving very limited support for the family. After the reform and opening up, the children welfare policy has been gradually developed from the compensatory system to the moderate universal benefit system. Particularly in the recent few years, the legal implementation of compulsory reporting policy, the alternative care system, the judicial practice of guardianship transfer system, and the active participation of nongovernmental organizations have jointly contributed to the rapid development of China's children protection policy and practice. However, the children protection in China is still facing a series of challenges:There is no authoritative system of children Protection Law (or children Welfare law); there is still a lack of state-mandated authoritative leading sector. With the influence of traditional Chinese culture, public power has difficulties in intervening in the family's private domain in the implementation process. The mandatory reporting and alternative care system has no specific implementation guides and there are no follow-up procedures with the two policies. Also, the poor coordination and integration of the governmental and nongovernmental sectors restricts the further development of children protection policy. Therefore, it is important to establish a family-centered children protection policy in China. To achieve this goal, it is pivotal to promote the structural and applicable children protection policy.

Key words: Child protection, policy analysis, system construction

中图分类号: 

  • C913
[1] 儿童权利宣言[EB/OL].[2018-01-20]. http://news.163.com/09/1119/17/5OGF7FAA00013U8R.html.
[2] FRANK FALKNER. Workshop on neglect. International child health[J]. 1997, 8(3):43-44.
[3] LAURA E B. Infants, children and adolescents[M]. Peking:Peking University Press, 2005:27-28.
[4] FREYMOND N, CAMERON G. Towards positive systems of child and family welfare:international comparisons of child protection, family service, and community caring systems[M]. Torronto:University of Toronto Press, 2006.
[5] NEIL GILBERT. Nigel parton and marit skivenes, child protection systems:international trends and orientations[J]. Social service review, 2012, 86(2):356-358.
[6] WENDY ROSE.The assessment frameork[M]//JAN HORWATCH. The child's world:the comprehensive guide to assessing children in need[M]. London:Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2010:38-44.
[7] DAVID JONES.Assessment of parenting[M]//The child's world:the comprehensive guide to assessing children in need[M]. London:Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2010:286-302.
[8] TRUTER E, FOUCHÉ A, THERON L. The resilience of child protection social workers:are they at risk and if so, how do they adjust? a Systematic meta-Synthesis[J]. British journal of social work, 2017, 47(3):846-863
[9] FOUCHÃ A, LE R L. Social workers' views on pre-trial therapy in cases of child sexual abuse in South Africa[J]. Journal of psychology in Africa, 2018, 76(2):23-33
[10] MACDONALD, GILLIAN S. Domestic violence, children's voices and child contact:exploring cafcass section 7 reports[D]. Bristol:University of Bristol, 2010.
[11] CHOR K H, MCCLELLAND G M, WEINER D A, et al. Patterns of out-of-home placement decision-making in child welfare[J]. Child abuse & neglect, 2013, 37(10):871-882
[12] 尚晓援,张雅桦. 建立有效的中国儿童保护制度[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
[13] 乔东平. 地方政府儿童保护主管机构建设研究——基于A县和B市的儿童保护试点[J]. 2016(3):18-27.
[14] 熊跃根. 福利国家儿童保护与社会政策的经验比较分析与启示[J]. 江海学刊,2014(3):96-103.
[15] 周俞, 曹克亮. 论我国儿童保护制度的完善[J]. 法制博览, 2014(10):282
[16] 尚晓援. 儿童保护制度的基本要素[J]. 社会福利(理论版), 2014(8):2-5
[17] 虞小明. 美国儿童保护给我国的启示[J]. 课程教育研究, 2014(1):30
[18] 国务院妇女儿童工作委员会办公室. 瑞典儿童保护与服务的实践及启示[J]. 中国妇运, 2014(1):20-24
[19] 梅文娟. 英国儿童虐待干预机制考察及其启示[J]. 山东警察学院学报, 2014(1):108-116.
[20] 谢秀芬. 家庭与家庭服务[M]. 台北:五南图书出版公司, 1987.
[21] 杨鑫辉. 危机与转折:心理学的中国化问题研究[M]. 哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社, 2002:51.
[22] 中华人民共和国未成年人保护法[EB/OL].[2018-01-20]. http://www.china.com.cn/policy/txt/2006-12/30/content_7582808.htm.
[23] 中华人民共和国预防未成年人犯罪法[EB/OL].[2018-01-20]. http://china.findlaw.cn/fagui/p_1/376230[EB/OL].html.
[24] 中国儿童发展纲要(2011-2020年)[M]. 北京:人民出版社, 2011.
[25] 中华人民共和国民政部. 关于开展适度普惠型儿童福利制度建设试点工作的通知[EB/OL].[2018-01-20]. http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/xw/tzgg/201306/20130615478862.shtml.
[26] 中华人民共和国民政部. 家庭寄养管理办法[EB/OL].[2018-02-04]. http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/gk/fg/shflhcssy/20150715848518.shtml.
[27] 国务院法制办.反家庭暴力法[EB/OL].[2018-01-20]. http://www.chinalaw.gov.cn/article/cazjgg/201411/20141100397718.shtml.
[28] 关于依法处理监护人侵害未成年人权益行为若干问题的意见[EB/OL].[2018-01-20]. http://www.law-lib.com/law/law_view.asp?id=477843.
[29] BERRICK, J D. Trends and issues in the U.S. child welfare system[M]//child protection systems. London:Oxford University Press, 2011.
[30] 陈云凡. 儿童防虐体系比较:社会政策视角[J]. 中国青年研究, 2011(9):43-45.
[31] GILBERT N. Combating child abuse:international perspectives and trends[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1997.
[32] 许嘉倪. 儿保社工员与施虐父母工作困境及因应之初探——以台北市为例[D]. 台北:东吴大学,2001.
[33] JAN HORWATH, BASINGSTOKE, PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. Child neglect:identification and assessment[M]. London:Palgrave Macmillan Press, 2007:281.
[34] Child Grounds for Child Welfare[EB/OL].[2018-01-20]. http://www.lastensuojelu.info/en/services.html.
[1] 冯元. 儿童性侵害发生的社会特征及预防策略[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(3): 72-77.
[2] 秦庆, 梁丽红, 李德波. 组织场域视角下儿童保护类社会组织资源整合机制探索——以昆明市为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(2): 59-67.
[3] 武艳华, 崔效辉. 儿童保护政策执行的制约因素与破解路径——基于史密斯政策执行过程模型分析[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2020, 20(3): 92-100.
[4] 乔东平, 廉婷婷, 苏林伟. 中国儿童福利政策新发展与新时代政策思考——基于2010年以来的政策文献研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019, 19(3): 78-88,95.
[5] 胡杰容. 儿童保护的现实困境与制度创新——以“南京虐童案”为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018, 18(3): 51-58.
[6] 刘玉兰, 彭华民. 西方儿童保护社会工作的理论转型与实践重构[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2017, 17(3): 5-11.
[7] 高丽茹. 美国儿童保护制度的发展对中国的启示[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2016, 16(6): 80-84.
[8] 李晓凤. 建构主义视角下的结构批判政策分析模式初探——以我国问题流浪儿童的社会救助政策为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2012, 12(6): 32-37.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!