社会发展视角下子代与亲代的照护差异研究——基于认知症照护者的质性分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 子代与亲代的照护差异影响照护质量与患者生命质量。从社会发展理论的分析框架着手，以19名子代照护者与10名亲代照护者为样本，分析两代照护者差异的特征和原因，并就照护服务的发展提出思考与建议。研究发现，子代与亲代的照护差异在照护理念与照护制度的变迁中发展，并形成解释因素，认知症患者的子代与亲代的照护差异主要表现为情感与认知、药物与非药物治疗、社会服务的选择等方面。照护者通过学习科学的照护理念与照护文化，尝试提供科学的照护，照护者自我力量不断发展，促进了照护质量的提升。老年照护服务力量通过政府的制度安排为认知症患者提供照护，弥补了家庭照护中缺失的力量。照护者自我力量、老年照护服务力量在社会发展中的融合形成了子代与亲代的照护差异，两者的结合能够更好地为认知症患者提供服务。正视子代与亲代照护差异也能为照护服务提供更好的路径。

关键词: 认知症, 子代与亲代照护, 照护差异, 社会发展理论

Abstract: Intergenerational and intragenerational differences in caregiving affect the quality of caregiving and patients’ quality of life. Based on the framework of social development theory, this study analyzes 19 offspring caregivers and 10 spouse caregivers, examines the characteristics and causes of intergenerational caregiving differences, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions. Intergenerational caregiving differences have developed and formed explanatory factors in the changes of care concepts and care systems. Intergenerational caregiving differences with dementia are reflected in three levels: emotional and recognition conflicts, treatment awareness, and care mode selection. The evolving self-strength improves the quality of caregiving through scientific caregiving with the concept and the culture of care. Social services for the elderly provide caregiving to make up for the lack of support in family caregiving. The integration of the caregivers’ self-strength and social service strength in social development forms intergenerational caregiving differences. The combination of the two can better provide services for patients with dementia. Facing intergenerational caregiving differences can also provide a better path for caregiving services.

Key words: Dementia, intergenerational caregiving, caregiving differences, social development theory

中图分类号:

C916

刘海桃, 顾东辉. 社会发展视角下子代与亲代的照护差异研究——基于认知症照护者的质性分析[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2023, 23(3): 60-68.

LIU Haitao, GU Donghui. Intergenerational and Intragenerational Caregiving Differences from the Perspective of Social Development: Based on a Qualitative Study of Dementia Caregivers[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(3): 60-68.

参考文献

[1] 费孝通. 家庭结构变动中的老年赡养问题——再论中国家庭结构的变动[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社科科学版), 1983(3): 6-15
[2] 齐亚强, 牛建林. 家庭成就观的代际传承及其对青少年教育获得的影响[J]. 青年研究, 2021(6): 13-26,91
[3] JIA CHEN, LUCY P JORDAN. Intergenerational support and life satisfaction of young-, old-and oldest-old adults in China[J]. Aging & mental health, 2016, 22(3): 412-420
[4] KUO LM, HUANG HL, HSU WC, et al. Home-based caregiver training: benefits differ by care receivers’ dementia diagnosis[J]. Geriatric nursing, 2016, 37(5): 376-384
[5] 于大川, 朱丽君, 赵小仕. 失能老人的照护特征与照护效果研究[J]. 南方人口, 2022(3): 27-38
[6] 朱榕, 张莉, 李娟, 等. 老年痴呆家庭照护者照护能力现状及影响因素研究[J]. 实用老年医学, 2019(1): 90-93
[7] 张亮. 中国儿童照顾政策研究: 基于性别、家庭和国家的视角[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2016: 21.
[8] CHUNG J C. An intergenerational reminiscence programme for older adults with early dementia and youth volunteers: values and challenges[J]. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2009, 23(2): 259-264
[9] YANG CHENG, JING XI, MARK W ROSENBERG, et al. Intergenerational differences in social support for the community-living elderly in Beijing, China[J]. Health science reports, 2018, 1(11): 1-10
[10] BARBARA D’AMEN, MARCO SOCCI, SARA SANTINI. Intergenerational caring: a systematic literature review on young and young adult caregivers of older people[J]. BMC Geriatrics, 2021, 21(1): 1-17
[11] 米奇利. 社会发展: 社会福利视角下的发展观[M]. 苗正民, 译. 上海: 格致出版社、上海人民出版社, 2009.
[12] 庞元正, 丁冬红. 当代西方社会发展理论新词典[M]. 长春: 吉林人民出版社, 2001: 8.
[13] MICHAEL WOOLCOCK, DEEPA NARAYA. Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy[J]. The World Bank research observe, 2000, 2(15): 225-249
[14] JAMES MIDGLEY. Social development: theory & practice[M]. Longdon: SAGE Publications, 2014.
[15] 赵建国, 邵思齐. 日本福利社会发展理论的实践应用及启示[J]. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(3): 85-92
[16] 郭林, 谌基东. 中国老年照护的嬗变、逻辑与制度完善[J]. 学术研究, 2021(7): 85-90,188
[17] 桂世勋. 合理调整养老机构的功能结构[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2001(4): 97-101,127
[18] 杨建军, 汤婧婕, 汤燕. 基于“持续照顾”理念的养老模式和养老设施规划[J]. 城市规划, 2012(5): 20-26,65
[19] 姜洪庆, 孙雅娟. 基于持续健康照顾理念的养老社区规划研究[J]. 南方建筑, 2015(6): 90-94
[20] 雷静雯. 认知症长期照料设施生活空间设计研究——基于日常活动视角[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2019: 24.
[21] WANG J, CAO Y, WU B, et al. Perceived empowerment, social support and quality of life among Chinese elderly residents in long-term care facilities[J]. Journal of aging and health, 2018, 5(2): 178-183
[22] S MORGAN, LH YODER. A concept analysis of person-centered care[J]. Journal of holistic nursing, 2012, 30(1): 6-15
[23] 赵雅欣, 钟清玲, 吴蓓. 中美老年痴呆患者养老或长期照护研究现状与前景分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2022(5): 1266-1270
[24] 程瑜, 陈思然. 共疫与熔补: 以“人”为中心的慢性病社区照护理念探析[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(6): 79-87
[25] 王振涛, 姜依辰, 吴巍. HAPPY照护模型助力认知症社区居家照护质量提升[J]. 质量与认证, 2020(2): 52-53
[26] 汪凤炎, 郑红. 中国文化心理学[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2013: 255-256.
[27] 甘绍平. 代际义务的论证问题[J]. 中国社会科学, 2019(1): 22-41,204-205
[28] 许琪, 王金水. 代际互惠对中国老年人生活满意度的影响[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(1): 104-115,145
[29] 穆光宗. 家庭养老制度的传统与变革: 基于东亚和东南亚地区的一项比较研究[M]. 北京: 华龄出版社, 2002: 212.
[30] 王跃生. 中国家庭代际关系的维系、变动和趋向[J]. 江淮论坛, 2011(2): 122-129
[31] 李猛. 韦伯: 法律与价值[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2001: 243-245.
[32] 龙玉其. 孝道与生计: 农村失能老人子女照护需求、照护冲突与调适[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(3): 71-81
[33] 路易斯·亨利·摩尔根. 古代社会[M]. 杨东莼, 马雍, 马巨, 译. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2007: 278-279.
[34] SHELLEY E CANNING, DARREN BLAKEBOROUGH. Intergenerational dance in long-term residential care: social citizenship in dementia care[J]. BC studies, 2019, 202(8): 167-178
[35] CHRISTOPHER R WARD, LENORE LOS KAMP, SALLY NEWMAN. The effects of participation in an intergenerational program on the behavior of residents with dementia[J]. Activities, adaptation & aging, 1996, 20(4): 61-76
[36] KLAUS HABERKERN, TINA SCHMID, MARC SZYDLIK. Gender differences in intergenerational care in European welfare states[J]. Ageing and society, 2015, 35(2): 298-320
[37] TRATTNER WALTER I. From poor law to welfare state: a history of social welfare in America[M]. 5th ed. New York: The Free Press, 1994: xxxii.
[38] 考斯塔·艾斯平-安德森. 福利资本主义的三个世界[M]. 郑秉文, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 22.
[39] TITMUSS R M. Commitment to welfare[M]. London: Allen & Unwin, 1928: 128.
[40] MARY DALY. Care as a good for social policy[J]. Journal of social policy, 2002, 31(4): 251-270
[41] ANTTONEN A, SIPILA, J. European social care services: is it possible to identify models?[J]. Journal of European social policy, 1996, 6(2): 87-100
[42] 理查德·蒂特马斯. 蒂特马斯社会政策十讲[M]. 江绍康, 译. 长春: 吉林出版集团, 2011: 32.
[43] PEARL A DYKSTRA. Cross-national differences in intergenerational family relations: the influence of public policy arrangements[J]. Innovation in aging, 2018, 1(2): 1-8
[44] 莫妮卡·亨宁克, 英格·哈特, 阿杰·贝利. 质性研究方法[M]. 王丽娟, 徐梦洁, 胡豹, 译. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2015: 95-96.
[45] 罗红光. “家庭福利”文化与中国福利制度建设[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(3): 145-161,244
[46] 刘海桃. 整合式照护: 基于认知症照护者的经验研究[J]. 社会工作, 2022(2): 1-12,104-105
[47] 杜鹏, 高云霞, 谢立黎. 中国老年照护服务: 概念框架与发展路径[J]. 老龄科学研究, 2022(9): 1-10
[48] 唐钧. 老年照护体系的整体效应[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2022(4): 94-104
[49] ELISA-MARIE BEHRNDT, MELANIE STRAUBMEIER, HILDEGARD SEIDL, et al. The German day-care study: multicomponent nondrug therapy for people with cognitive impairment in day-care centres supplemented with caregiver counselling (DeTaMAKS)–study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial[J]. BMC health services research, 2017, 17(7): 1-16
[50] 安东尼·哈尔, 詹姆斯·梅志里. 发展型社会政策[M]. 罗敏, 范酉庆, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2006: 5-6.
[51] FRANCESCO MIELE, FEDERICO NERESINI, GIOVANNI BONIOLO, et al. Supportive care for older people with dementia: socio-organizational implications[J]. Ageing & society, 2022, 42(2): 376-408
[52] MILTE R, RATCLIFFE J, BRADLEY C, et al. Evaluating the quality of care received in long-term care facilities from a consumer perspective: development and construct validity of the Consumer Choice Index–Six Dimension instrument[J]. Ageing & society, 2019, 39(1): 138-160

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed