SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5): 51-56.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Medical Staff's Perceptual Evaluation of Medical Social Work and Its Analysis

ZHONG Mingwei, LIU Junrong   

  1. College of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511436, China
  • Received:2017-12-25 Online:2018-09-15 Published:2018-09-27

Abstract: Based on the large sample survey data in Guangdong province, the author analyzed the perceptual evaluation of medical social work by medical staff from medical institutions of different nature, type and level, and the related factors that affect the evaluation of medical social work, and provided theoretical reference for further strengthening medical social work. The questionnaire was self-designed and further amended by the experts, and then input into the "questionnaire star" enterprise version system to facilitate the sample survey. The data generated from the system was processed and calculated, combined with the theory and practice to discuss and analyze. A cording to the findings, only 38.2% of the surveyed units usually carried out medical social work services, and 54.5% of the sample population considered that medical social work service had modest effect, while 9.7% of the sample considered that medical social work service had poor or even no effect. 88.8% of the sample population said it was fairly necessary or necessary to set up a medical social work organization within the medical institution, and 52.2% of the sample population thought it better that the government purchased the service from social work group and provided it to institutions and patients free of charge. There were no significant differences in the evaluation of the medical social work services effect provided by different types of medical institutions, (p > 0.05). There were significant differences in the overall medical social work service frequency and service effect among different medical institutions, p < 0.05. It is obvious that medical staff generally has a low perceptual evaluation of medical social work, and such work is not going well. The quality of work needs to be improved. The necessity of such work is to be recognized. Government-led model is more preferred.

Key words: medical institutions, practitioners, medical service, social work, perceptual evaluation

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 刘继同. 改革开放30年以来中国医务社会工作的历史回顾、现状与前瞻[J]. 社会工作, 2012(1):4-10
[2] 中共中央,国务院.中共中央国务院关于深化医药卫生体制改革的意见[EB/OL].(2009-04-08).http://www.gov.cn/test/2009-04/08/content_1280069.htm.
[3] 赵景瑞. 中国医务社会工作实务发展中存在的问题与对策[J]. 新西部(理论版), 2016(22):14,28
[4] 黄如意,程乐森. 利益相关者视角下的新型医患关系构建[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2015(6):927-930
[5] 朱凡.上海市医务社会工作现状研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2010:25.
[6] 李昀鋆. 医疗体制改革背景下医务社会工作专业化发展路径探索[J]. 社会福利(理论版), 2015(3):25-31
[7] 尹放,黄莉. 美国医院的医务社会工作及其启示[J]. 医学与哲学, 2014(2):51-54
[8] 许廉,朱建民,赵桂绒,等. 构建医务社会工作和志愿服务的联动发展模式[J]. 中国医院, 2014(6):3-5
[9] 刘岚,孟群. 当前我国几种医务社会工作实务模式比较[J]. 医学与社会, 2010(2):36-38
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[7] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[8] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[9] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[10] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[11] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[12] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
[13] YANG Hong, CHEN Tao. Multi-Stakeholders Collaboration and Village Governance Supported by Social Work Backbone: Research on the Governance Model of Z Village in Beijing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 80-91.
[14] HE Xuesong, WANG Tianqi. 2021 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 5-15.
[15] HE Jian, LAN Caiguang. Help Others by Mutual Assistance VS. Help Others to Self-Reliance: A New Interpretation of the Localization of Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 16-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!