SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 64-72.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of the “Triple Logic” of Strategic Planning of Social Work Service Projects: Based on Social Service Development of Guangzhou and Foshan

GU Jiangxia   

  1. School of Humanities and Communication, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou, Guangdong ,510320, China
  • Received:2020-06-28 Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-01-12

Abstract: The social work service project tries to use the elements of the integration project to ensure the realization of the project objectives, and the issue of project strategic planning arises accordingly. The logic of social work service project is embodied in the logic of project management, social service and social research. Project management logic is the logic of promoting project development from the perspective of management based on the regularity of different stages of the project life cycle. From the perspective of practice, social service logic is the logic of service promotion with clear goals carried out by the service provider based on the evaluation of the needs of the service object. Social research logic is a process of knowledge production and reproduction from abstract cognition to concrete practice and then to abstract cognition from the perspective of epistemology. Based on social service development of Guangzhou and Foshan, due to the imbalance of project team's ability to advance “triple logic” and the complexity of practice situation, “triple logic” seldom develops synchronously in practice. Local governments and social work service agencies can use the “triple logic” framework to clarify the development direction of the project, improve the strategic planning capacity of the project, strengthen the cooperation ability between different stakeholders, and steadily promote the professional social work services.

Key words: social work service programs, strategic planning, project management, social service, social studies

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 莫彩云. 社区联动助力成长梦[EB/OL]. [2020-04-07]. http://www.shuangbai-plan.org/protal/16259/.
[2] 王思斌. 我国社会工作从嵌入性发展到融合性发展之分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(3): 29-38
[3] 朱健刚, 陈安娜. 嵌入中的专业社会工作与街区权力关系——对一个政府购买服务项目的个案分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(1): 43-64
[4] 廖慧卿, 岳经纶. 控制与共生: 街道体制下的社会服务递送——基于广州市家庭综合服务的实践[J]. 中国公共政策评论, 2014(8): 93-109
[5] 管兵. 竞争性与反向嵌入性: 政府购买服务与社会组织发展[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015(3): 81-92
[6] 吴耀健, 陈安娜. 行政化与专业自闭桎梏: 广东D区民办社会工作机构的内卷化[J]. 社会工作, 2017(10): 71-81
[7] 莱斯特·M·萨拉蒙, 肖娜. 政府工具: 新治理指南[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 272-288.
[8] 王浦劬, JUDE HOWELL. 政府向社会力量购买公共服务发展研究——基于中英经验的分析[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 14-18.
[9] 折晓叶, 陈婴婴. 项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑: 对“项目进村”案例的社会学分析[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(4): 126-148
[10] 渠敬东. 项目制: 一种新的国家治理机制[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(5): 113-130
[11] 陈家建. 项目制与基层政府动员——对社会管理项目化运作的社会学考察[J]. 中国社会科学, 2013(2): 64-79
[12] 陈家建. 项目化治理的组织形式——基于一个国家项目的历史过程分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2017(2): 150-173
[13] 张远凤. 非营利组织管理理论、制度与实务[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 176-191.
[14] 黄源协. 社会工作管理[M]. 台北: 扬智文化出版社, 1999: 39-57.
[15] BRIAN CORBY. 社会工作研究的实践应用[M]. 严成芬, 译. 上海: 格致出版社, 2010: 26-63.
[1] WU Jiajun, GAO Li, XU Xuanguo. How Can the Third-Party Evaluation Contribute to the Transformation of Government-Society Relationship: Based on the Experience of Shanghai H District Women’s Federation in Purchasing Social Services [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(6): 14-24.
[2] Richard M.Titmuss, KE Yanghua, MA Xiaoting, LIU Jitong. Welfare State and Welfare Society [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(6): 85-92.
[3] FANG Wei. Accreditation of Social Service Program: Current Situation in China and Its Reflection from an International Perspective [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(5): 25-32.
[4] NIE Yumei, LI Jiang. Third-party Evaluation Practice and Operation Logic of Social Service Projects from the Principal-agent Perspective: Survey based on H City Practice [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(5): 42-52.
[5] XU Daowen, TANG Dating. A Study on the Performance Evaluation of Social Work Agency from the Perspective of Accountability: Based on the Performance Evaluation of Social Work Agency in S City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(4): 28-36.
[6] XIANG Yu, LEUNG Tong-lit Charles. Research on Developing Information Systems of Social Service Projects: A Case Study of Zhuhai [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(1): 72-81.
[7] HUO Xuan, LIN Mingang. Study on the Supply Status and Influencing Factors of Government Basic Social Services [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(5): 93-102.
[8] LIU Yuzhen, YANG Jie. The Application of Three Social Organizations Linkage in Foreigners’ Social Management and Social Service: The Experience of Guangzhou [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(4): 73-79.
[9] LIAO Hongbing, LIAO Biao. Supply Side of Social Services in Urban Communities: Based onShifts in Residential Spatial Structure [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(2): 77-84.
[10] Chen Xiangyun. Practice Mode, Dilemma and NPO Development Path of Government Purchase Service [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(2): 52-58.
[11] XU Xuanguo, HUANG Ying. Separation and Unity of Government-Society: The Risks and Governing Methods of the Third Party Assessment under Government Purchasing Social Services: Based on the Evaluation Practice in “S” City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 17(2): 70-77.
[12] YANG Li. Government Purchase of Service: Predicaments and Countermeasures of Private Social Service Organizations [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 14(4): 28-.
[13] LIU Zheng.
China Social Work against the Background of Social Governance
[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 14(3): 17-22.
[14] LIU Jinglin, ZHU Yakun. On the Advantages of Private Social Service Organizations in the Public Emergency Capability Construction——With Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 13(6): 57-62.
[15] . A Quantitative Study of the Factors Influencing the Degree of Satisfaction with Service Provided by Comprehensive Family Service Centre
—— With Comprehensive Family Service Centre of T Street in Guangzhou as an Example
[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 13(4): 12-19.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!