SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 15-28.

• SHEHUI GONGZUO • Previous Articles    

Transforming the “ Threateners ”: Social Work’s Engagement in Community-Based Co-Management of Nature Reserves

LIN Fangfei, ZHANG Zihao   

  1. School of Politics and Public Administration, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830046, China
  • Received:2022-05-09 Published:2022-09-21

Abstract: Responding to global ecological crisis requires more interdisciplinary collaborations. Social work has been undergoing a transition from pursuing social justice to promoting broader ecological justice. The exploration in ecological protection has no longer restricted to the field of natural environment, but focused more on the community work around nature reserves in reconstructing the harmonious relationships between human and nature. Taking the practice of community-based co-management in B Nature Reserve in Sichuan Province as a case, this article mainly discusses the feasibility and effect of social work participating in community work around nature reserves. This article argues that social work has professional advantages in the work of community-based co-management in nature reserves, and the relationship between B Nature Reserve and its surrounding community has been effectively improved by the practice based on the social work principles of mutual respect, equality and empowerment, and the strengths perspective. Meanwhile, local community residents have experienced the identity transformation from “threats” to “protectors” of the ecological environment. The participation of social work also coordinate the relationship between economic development and ecological protection. In addition, combined with China’s ecological civilization construction, this article envisions a promising future for ecological/green social work in the fields of education and practice.

Key words: community-based co-management, ecological/green social work, nature reserves, coexistence between human and Nature

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 古学斌, LENA DOMINELLI. 环境危机背景下绿色社会工作及其对中国社会发展的意义[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2020(3): 37-49
[2] MATTHIES A, NARHIK, WARD K. The eco-social approach in social work[M]. Jyväskylän: Sophi, 2001: 5-12.
[3] BESTHORN F H. Deep ecology’s contributions to social work: a ten-year retrospective[J]. International journal of social welfare, 2012, 21(3): 248-259
[4] 莉娜·多米内利. 绿色社会工作: 从环境危机到环境正义[M]. 王景迁, 齐文华, 吴玥, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019.
[5] PEETERS J. The place of social work in sustainable development: towards eco-social practice[J]. International journal of social welfare, 2012, 21(3): 287-298
[6] 张和清, 尚静. 社会工作干预与中国乡村生态、生计和生活可持续发展的行动研究——以绿耕项目为例[J]. 社会学研究, 2021(6): 68-89,227-228
[7] 古学斌, 兰茜, 齐华栋. 老年人与地方营造: 一项跨学科灾后社区重建的行动研究[J]. 社会工作, 2020(3): 3-15,109
[8] 古学斌, 齐华栋, LENA DOMINELLI L. 空间正义与绿色社会工作介入: 四川雅安灾后参与式社区设计的行动研究[J]. 中国社会工作研究, 2020(1): 1-21,216
[9] 张引, 庄优波, 杨锐. 世界自然保护地社区共管典型模式研究[J]. 风景园林, 2020(3): 18-23
[10] 蕾切尔·卡逊. 寂静的春天[M]. 林海彦, 译. 呼和浩特: 远方出版社, 2008.
[11] 联合国环境规划署. 与自然和平相处:应对气候变化、生物多样性丧失和污染危机的科学蓝图. [EB/OL].[2021-02-18]. https://wedocs.unep.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34948/MPN_ch.pdf.
[12] 应急管理部—教育部减灾与应急管理研究院,应急管理部国家减灾中心,红十字会与红新月会国际联合会.2020年全球自然灾害评估报告[EB/OL].[2020-10]. https://zaihaifangyu.cn/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2020-Global-Natural-Disaster-Assessment-Report-CH.pdf.
[13] 世界银行. 世界银行与全球减灾和恢复基金(GFDRR)报告[EB/OL]. (2016-11-14). https://www.shihang.org/zh/news/press-release/2016/11/14/natural-disasters-force-26-million-people-into-poverty-and-cost-520bn-in-losses-every-year-new-world-bank-analysis-finds.
[14] 世界自然基金会. 地球生命力报告[EB/OL]. [2022-03-10]. https://livingplanet.panda.org/zh-hk/.
[15] COX N, YOUNG B E, BOWLES P, et al. A global reptile assessment highlights shared. conservation needs of tetrapods[J/OL]. Nature, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04664-7.
[16] 世界卫生组织. 世界90%以上儿童每天呼吸有毒的空气[EB/OL]. (2018-10-29) https://www.who.int/zh/news/item/29-10-2018-more-than-90-of-the-world%e2%80%99s-children-breathe-toxic-air-every-day.
[17] 联合国. 联合国新报告分析三大相互关联的环境危机[EB/OL]. [2021-02-18]. https://news.un.org/zh/story/2021/02/1078302.
[18] 高丽, 于梦娇, 赵环. 全球化背景下的生态议题与社会工作的绿色转向[J]. 新视野, 2018(4): 69-75
[19] 严骏夫, 徐选国. 从社会正义迈向生态正义: 社会工作的理论拓展与范式转移[J]. 学海, 2019(3): 87-93
[20] 程鹏立. 环境社会工作: 理论、实务与教育[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(6): 94-103
[21] 陈星星, 徐选国. 绿色社会工作: 迈向生态环境关怀的社会工作新论述——兼论对我国社会工作介入生态文明建设的启示[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(3): 1-10
[22] 罗桥. 环境社会工作: 概念、价值观与实践路径[J]. 学习与探索, 2020(2): 43-51, 199
[23] 曹诗颂, 王艳慧, 段福洲, 等. 中国贫困地区生态环境脆弱性与经济贫困的耦合关系——基于连片特困区714个贫困县的实证分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016(8): 2614-2622
[24] MILLER S E, HAYWARD R A, SHAW T V. Environmental shifts for social work: a principles approach[J]. International journal of social welfare, 2012, 21(3): 270-277
[25] RAMSAY S, BODDY J. Environmental social work: a concept analysis[J]. British journal of social work, 2016, 47(1): 68-86
[26] 尚静, 张和清. 贫困、环境退化与绿色减贫——一个华南村庄的社会工作实践案例研究[J]. 开放时代, 2020(6): 61-76,7
[27] 古学斌, 张和清, 杨锡聪. 地方国家、经济干预和农村贫困: 一个中国西南村落的个案分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2004(2): 79-88
[28] 娄建君. 论社区共管与自然保护区可持续发展[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2020(6): 10-11
[29] 谢屹, 温亚利. 浅谈参与式发展理论在自然保护中的运用[J]. 林业调查规划, 2005(6): 81-83
[30] 杨锐. 试论世界国家公园运动的发展趋势[J]. 中国园林, 2003(7): 10-15
[31] 靳乐山, 左停, 董炳艳, 等. 中国自然保护区社区资源共管综述[C]//李小云, 左停, 靳乐山. 共管: 从冲突走向合作. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2006: 207-235.
[32] 张琛. 西洞庭湖自然保护区社区共管体制研究[C]//李小云, 左停, 靳乐山. 共管: 从冲突走向合作. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2006: 152-173.
[33] 张金良, 李焕芳, 黄方国. 社区共管——一种全新的保护区管理模式[J]. 生物多样性, 2000(3): 347
[34] 李忠, 马静, 徐基良, 等. 我国自然保护区社区管理成效评价[J]. 林业经济, 2016(7): 27-31
[35] 张引, 杨锐. 中国自然保护区社区共管现状分析和改革建议[J]. 中国园林, 2020(8): 31-35
[36] 石慧书, 刘惠芬, 何兴东. 宁夏哈巴湖国家级自然保护区社区共管模式探索与实践[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2021(1): 78-82
[37] 张艳. 自然保护区社区参与现实困境与对策[J]. 人民论坛, 2016(2): 169-171
[38] 张引, 刘海龙, 杨锐. 社区共管与协调生态保护和可持续发展——基于秦巴山脉区域5个典型案例的分析[J]. 中国工程科学, 2020(1): 111-119
[39] 刘静, 苗鸿, 郑华, 等. 卧龙自然保护区与当地社区关系模式探讨[J]. 生态学报, 2009(1): 259-271
[40] 宋志勇,召玉龙, 张忠员, 等. 西双版纳国家级自然保护区社区共管实践与思考[J]. 林业调查规划, 2020(6): 69-73,112
[41] 廖凌云, 赵智聪, 杨锐. 基于6个案例比较研究的中国自然保护地社区参与保护模式解析[J]. 中国园林, 2017(8): 30-33
[42] 张艳. 自然保护区社区参与的困境及应对思路[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2021(20): 92-94
[43] 梁漱溟. 梁漱溟全集(第2卷)[M]. 济南: 山东人民出版社, 1989: 595.
[44] 严海蓉, 陈航英. 农村合作社运动与第三条道路: 争论与反思[J]. 开放时代, 2015(2): 180-200,8
[45] 国家林业局野生动植物保护司. 自然保护区社区共管. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2002: 1-5.
[46] DOMINELLI L. Environmental justice at the heart of social work practice: greening the profession[J]. International journal of social welfare, 2013, 22(4): 431-439
[47] 徐永祥. 试论我国社区社会工作的职业化与专业化[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2000(4): 56-60
[48] 文军, 吕洁琼. 社区为本: 反贫困社会工作的理论建构及其反思[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(1): 10-18
[49] 古学斌. 性别性受苦——中国贵州苗族中年妇女关于家庭暴力的口述见证[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2014(4): 3-21
[50] 古学斌, 张和清, 杨锡聪. 专业限制与文化识盲: 农村社会工作实践中的文化问题[J]. 社会学研究, 2007(6): 161-179,244-245
[51] 文军, 黄锐. 论资产为本的社区发展模式及其对中国的启示[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2008(6): 74-78
[52] 左停, 靳乐山, 李小云, 等. 思茅市自然保护区社区共管的实证研究[C]//李小云, 左停, 靳乐山. 共管: 从冲突走向合作. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2006: 207-235.
[53] DENNIS SALEEBEY. 优势视角——社会工作实践的新模式[M]. 李亚文, 杜立婕, 译. 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2004: 211-232.
[54] 李图强. 以优势视角设计: 社会工作者如何进行社区工作与社区发展实践[J]. 社会工作(下半月), 2010(8): 4-8
[55] DOMINELLI L. Social work: theory and practice for a changing profession[M]. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2004: 159.
[56] 何国良. “关系”: 社会工作理论与实践的本质[J]. 社会建设, 2021(1): 3-16
[57] 何雪松, 王天齐. 社会工作的关系思维: 三个传统与新的综合[J]. 新视野, 2021(6): 62-69
[58] 郭伟和. 迈向反身性实践的社会工作实务理论——当前社会工作理论界的若干争论及其超越[J]. 学海, 2018(1): 125-133
[59] 侯利文. 社会工作知识论基础的再认识——兼论社会工作的实践转向[J]. 学习与实践, 2019(5): 68-77
[60] 文军, 吴越菲. 社区为本: 灾害社会工作服务及其本土实践——以云南鲁甸地震灾区社会工作服务为例[J]. 河北学刊, 2016(5): 153-160
[61] NUGGEHALLI R K, PROKOPY L S. Motivating factors and facilitating conditions explaining women’s participation in co-management of Sri Lankan forests[J]. Forest policy and economics, 2009, 11(4): 288-293
[62] NEWAZ W, SHAHRIAR R. Wetland resource governance in Bangladesh: an analysis of community-based co-management approach[J]. Environmental development, 2019, 32(4): 1-12
[63] 马克思. 马克思资本论(第1卷)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2004: 207-231.
[64] LÖWY M. Ecosocialism: a vital synthesis. [EB/OL]. [2022-12-12]. https://mronline.org/2020/12/12/ecosocialism-a-vital-synthesis/.
[65] SAITO K. Marx’s theory of metabolism in the age of global ecological crisis[J]. Historical materialism, 2020, 28(2): 1-22
[66] BERNSTEIN H. Class dynamics of agrarian change[M]. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press, 2010: 16.
[67] 杨明, 骆江玲, 明亮. 论替代生计项目在乡村的发展——以NGO在三江平原生态保护项目为例[J]. 农村经济, 2010(4): 101-104
[68] 尚静, 张和清. 从脱贫攻坚到乡村振兴: 社会工作的实践逻辑及策略——以广东X村的社区减贫项目为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(4): 31-41
[69] 张和清, 古学斌, 杨锡聪. 中国灾后社区重建的结构性困境及其出路思考——以绿耕灾害社会工作实践为例[J]. 新西部, 2018(13): 25-31
[70] 闫红红, 郭燕平, 古学斌. 合作经济、集体劳动与农村妇女——一个华南村落的乡村旅舍实践案例[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2017(6): 36-47
[71] 宋志娇. 高寒草原家庭承包经营体制亟待创新[J]. 经济导刊, 2015(10): 71-75
[72] CHEN H, SHIVAKOTI G, ZHU T, et al. Livelihood Sustainability and community based co-management of forest resources in China: changes and improvement[J]. Environmental management, 2012, 49(1): 219-228
[73] BEGOSSI A, BROWN D. Experiences with fisheries co-management in Latin America and the Caribbean[J]. Springer Netherlands, 2003, 26(8): 135-152
[74] 巨力. 生态文明的中国道路 [EB/OL]. (2019-11-01) http://www.qstheory.cn/dukan/qs/2019-11/01/c_1125178887.htm.
[75] 洪大用. 关于中国环境问题和生态文明建设的新思考[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2013(10): 4-10,2
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] WEN Hao, Sile Hu. Academic Stress and Internalizing Problems among Chinese High Schoolers: A Systematic Review of Potential Moderators and Implications [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 48-61.
[7] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[8] PAN Li, SUN Jie, WANG Yean. A Study on the Mechanism of Building Rural Community Resilience from Co-Production in Township Social Work Stations: Taking the “He Project” in Wangcheng District as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 75-85.
[9] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[10] ZHOU Xiaoyan, ZHANG Jianhua. Research on Policy Regulation to Alleviate the Fertility Problem of the Rural Population in Northeast China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 93-100.
[11] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[12] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[13] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[14] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[15] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!