社会工作与管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6): 74-79.

• 社会政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

发展主义理论视角下的减贫策略研究——以新加坡为例

亓迪1, 王化起2   

  1. 1. 河海大学公共管理学院, 江苏 南京, 211100;
    2. 东南大学人文学院, 江苏 南京, 211100
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-19 出版日期:2018-11-15 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 作者简介:亓迪(1989-),女,汉族,讲师,博士;主要研究方向:贫困救助,儿童发展,社会政策。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学青年基金“家庭社会经济地位与儿童早期发展:影响干预机制研究”(71804041);教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目“家庭社会经济地位对儿童早期发展影响机制研究”(18YJCZH139);2017年东南大学中央高校科研业务费“城市困境儿童多部门协同救助网建设路径研究”(2242017S20009)。

A Research on the Anti-poverty Policies from the Perspective of Developmentalism: The Case of Singapore

QI Di1, WANG Huaqi2   

  1. 1. School of Public Administration, Hohai University;
    2. School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211100
  • Received:2018-03-19 Online:2018-11-15 Published:2018-11-15

摘要: 凯恩斯主义强调政府责任和新自由主义强调市场责任主体都未能有效解决贫困问题。20世纪70年代出现的发展理论视角强调多方共治,注重调动多元责任主体参与减贫的能动性,减贫策略上强调贫困对象增权赋能和积极就业,鼓励贫困家庭资产积累,注重减贫的经济性和社会性双重属性。新加坡的多项减贫举措体现了发展视角的减贫理念。以新加坡为案例重点介绍其减贫举措,归纳发展主义视角下减贫理念和策略路径,为我国精准扶贫提供借鉴启示。

关键词: 发展主义, 干预模式, 减贫, 新加坡

Abstract: Keynesianism emphasizes the responsibilities of the government while Neo-liberalism stresses the status of market as liability subject. But they both failed to address the problem of poverty. Developmentalism, which emerged in the 1970s, emphasizes the multiparty co-governance, pays attention to mobilize the initiative of multiple liability subjects to participate in poverty reduction, and lays stress on empowerment of poverty groups and their active employment in anti-poverty policies, encourages the poor families to accumulate wealth, and highlight the economic and social features of poverty reduction. A series of anti-poverty measures from Singapore reflects the idea of poverty reduction from the developmentalist perspective. Taking Singapore as a case, this paper introduces its anti-poverty policies in a detailed way and summarizes the developmentalist anti-poverty idea and strategies, offering a reference for targeted poverty alleviation.

Key words: developmentalism, intervening model, anti-poverty policy, Singapore

中图分类号: 

  • C916
[1] TANG K L. Social welfare development in East Asia[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 2000:1-18.
[2] HOLLIDAY I. Productivist welfare capitalism:social policy in East Asia[J]. Political studies, 2000, 48(4):706-723.
[3] ASPALTER C. The East Asian welfare model[J]. International journal of social welfare, 2006, 15(4):290-301.
[4] 熊跃根. 国家力量、社会结构与文化传统——中国、日本和韩国福利范式的理论探索与比较分析[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2007(4):48-56.
[5] STARKE P. The politics of welfare state retrenchment:a literature review[J]. Social policy & administration, 2006, 40(1):104-120.
[6] WIDING P. Is the East Asian welfare model still productive?[J]. Journal of Asian public policy, 2008, 1(1):18-31.
[7] 林卡, 赵怀娟. 论"东亚福利模式"研究及其存在的问题[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2010(5):64-72.
[8] 古允文. 東亞福利研究的發展與對台灣的啟示[EB/OL].[2018-01-20]. https://www.douban.com/group/topic/14955998/.
[9] PARK C, JUNG D. The Asian welfare regimes revisited:the preliminary typologies based on welfare legislation and expenditure[C]//4th International conference on restructuring care responsibility. Dynamics of welfare mix in East Asia, 2007:20-21.
[10] 王思斌. 走向发展型社会政策与社会组织建设[J]. 社会学研究, 2007(2):187-189.
[11] 钱宁, 陈立周. 当代发展型社会政策研究的新进展及其理论贡献[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2011(4):85-89.
[12] 马凤芝. 社会发展视野下的社会工作[J]. 广东社会科学, 2014(1):222-228.
[13] 贾玉娇.新加坡社会保障制度[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社, 2017:1-30.
[14] MIDGLEY H. Social policy for development[M]. Los angeles:Sage publications, 2004:1-43.
[15] MIDGLEY J, PAWAR M. Future directions in social development[M].New York:Palgrave macmillan US, 2017:1-57.
[16] SHERRADEN M. Assets and poor:a new American welfare policy[M]. New York:M.E. sharpe, 2017:1-60.
[17] PATEL L. Social welfare and social development in South Africa[M]. Johannesburg:Oxford university press, 2005:1-15.
[18] 陆德泉, 向荣. 社会发展视角探索社会工作的本土化策略——以南非建构发展性社会工作体系的路径为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(5):1-36.
[19] SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT. Ministry of social and family development[EB/OL].[2017-12-20]. https://www.msf.gov.sg/Pages/default.aspx.
[20] 占少华. 福利转型:新加坡社会救助政策的新变化及其启示[J]. 社会政策研究, 2017(2):55-64.
[1] 向德平, 华汛子, 金旖. 视角转换与方式创新:减贫社会工作的本土实践[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2017, 17(6): 5-11,58.
[2] 米银俊,何敬宁. 福利多元视角下新加坡社区福利范式的话语变迁与实践探讨[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2016, 16(1): 68-73.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!