西欧儿童福利的多元发展趋势及对中国的启示

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 2019年我国民政部新设儿童福利司，负责统筹设计儿童福利制度，进一步说明随着我国社会福利体系的不断完善，儿童福利已成为当代社会福利体系建设的核心之一，儿童权利的促进与保护更是社会治理的关键。基于此，探讨西欧四国(法国、德国、比利时、荷兰)儿童福利一体化的体系建设、精细化的福利津贴、政府主导的儿童服务、完整的儿童保护立法以及分级化的儿童福利标准，并透过比较视角，针对我国现阶段儿童发展性福利的供给不足及立法缺失，建议在我国现有儿童福利体系上，进一步完善基层专业人才队伍配备，强化儿童福利立法，鼓励发展民间社工机构。

关键词: 福利社会, 儿童福利, 西欧国家, 政策启示

Abstract: In 2019, Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs set up a new department of children welfare, which is responsible for the overall design of the children welfare system. This will further illustrate that with the continuous improvement of China's social welfare system, children welfare has become one of the construction cores of the contemporary social welfare system, and the promotion and protection of children's rights is the key to social governance. Based on this context, the paper explores the integration system of the child welfare in four Western European countries (France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands), concerning the refined welfare benefits, government-led child services, complete child protection legislation, and the hierarchical child welfare standard. From a comparative perspective, the paper puts forward relevant policy suggestions on the shortage of supply and legislation of developmental children welfare in China at the present stage:in the existing children welfare system in China, the government could further improve professional teams at the grassroots level, strengthen children welfare legislation, and encourage the development of non-government social work agencies.

Key words: welfare society, child welfare, Western European countries, policy enlightenment

中图分类号:

C916

柳静虹. 西欧儿童福利的多元发展趋势及对中国的启示[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019, 19(4): 21-28.

LIU Jinghong. Diversified Development Trends of Children Welfare in Western Europe and its Enlightenment to China[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(4): 21-28.

参考文献 29

[1]	MAHON R. Child care: toward what kind of “social Europe”?[J]. Social politics: international studies in gender, state & society, 2002, 9(3): 343-379
[2]	DURKHEIM E. The rules of sociological method[M].Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1938: 50-60.
[3]	SASSEN S. A sociology of globalization[M]. New York: W.W.Norton & Company, Inc, 2007:3-27.
[4]	DURKHEIM EMILE. Suicide: a study in sociology[M]. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge, 2005: 21-49.
[5]	BECK U. Individualization: institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences[J]. Sage, 2002: 1-40
[6]	法国家庭补助局(CAF). Allocations familiales[EB/OL].[2018-12-27]. https://www.caf.fr.
[7]	FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT AGENCY. Family and kinder[EB/OL]. [2018-12-27]. https://www.arbeitsagentur.de/familie-und-kinder/infos-rund-um-kindergeld.
[8]	比利时家庭联邦中心(FAMIFED). Allocations familiales de base et suppléments[EB/OL].[2018-12-27]. https://famifed.be.
[9]	THE SOCIALE VERZEKERINGS BANK (SVB). Child benefit amounts[EB/OL].[2018-12-27]. https://www.svb.nl/int/en/kinderbijslag/betaling/hoeveel_kinderbijslag_krijgt_u/index.jsp.
[10]	周维宏. 社会福利政策的新基本原则:“看护四边形理论” 及其研究课题[J]. 社会政策研究, 2016(1): 111-126
[11]	JENSON JANE. The Lego paradigm and new social risks: consequences for children[M]//J LEWIS. Children, changing families and welfare states. UK Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006: 27-50.
[12]	LISTER RUTH. Children (but not Women) first: new labor, child welfare and gender[J]. Critical social policy, 2006, 26(2): 315-35
[13]	BENNETT, JOHN, COLLETTE TAYLOR. Starting strong Ⅱ: early childhood education and care.[R] Paris: OECD, 2006.
[14]	PENN H, L LOYD E. The costs of childcare[J]. CWRC working paper, 2013(18): 25-29
[15]	DALY M. What adult worker model? a critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective[J]. Social politics: international studies in gender, state & society, 2011, 18(1): 1-23
[16]	JOHN P MARTIN. Starting strong: early childhood education and care[R]. Stockholm: OECD, 2001.
[17]	EUROSTAT. European commission database[EB/OL].[2018-12-27]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
[18]	DAUNE-RICHARD AM. Women's work between family and welfare state: part-time work and childcare in France and Sweden[J]. Care and social integration in European societies, 2005(7): 215
[19]	欧盟议会. 关于保护儿童免遭性剥削和性虐待公约[EB/OL]. [2018-12-27]. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/0900001680084822.
[20]	EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Youth wiki national description[R].Belgium: youth policies in Belgium (Flemish Community), 2017.
[21]	ASE. Aide sociale à l'enfance[EB/OL].[2018-12-27]. https://www.ase. fr.
[22]	COURRIER HEBDOMADAIRE. Les protestants en Belgique[J]. Centre de recherche et d’information socio-politiques, 1994(5): 1-66
[23]	比利时全国儿童权利委员会. National Commission on the rights of the child[EB/OL].[2018-12-27]. https://ncrk-cnde.be/en/.
[24]	RODGER JOHN J. Social solidarity, welfare and post-emotionalism[J]. Journal of social policy, 2003, 32(3): 403-421
[25]	ARTS W, GELISSEN J. Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: does the type really matter?[J]. Acta sociologica, 2001, 44(4): 283-299
[26]	EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Solidarity in Europe-alive and active.[M]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018.
[27]	翁玉佳. 福利多元主义视角下我国发展性儿童福利探析[J]. 劳动保障世界, 2018(27): 12-13
[28]	顾严. 儿童福利: 从“标准的小众”到“精准的大众”[J]. 中国民政, 2018(3): 51
[29]	中共中央办公厅, 国务院办公厅.关于印发《民政部职能配置、内设机构和人员编制规定》的通知[EB/OL].[2019-1-24]. http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/xw/mzyw/201901/20190100014623.shtml.

相关文章 15

[1]	朱浩, 徐姝红. 社会组织参与儿童福利服务供给的困境与机制创新：以上海为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(2): 70-78.
[2]	蒂特马斯, 柯洋华, 马小婷, 刘继同. 福利国家和福利社会[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(6): 85-92.
[3]	刘玉兰, 彭华民. 能力为本的儿童福利社会工作教育模式转型研究——以155项社会工作专业硕士培养项目为分析对象[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(5): 33-41.
[4]	万国威, 裴婷昊. 迈向儿童投资型国家：中国儿童福利制度的时代转向——兼论民政部儿童福利司的建设方略[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019, 19(4): 7-13.
[5]	黄晓燕, 张恒茜. 基于制度比较基础上的中国儿童福利政策转向[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019, 19(4): 14-20.
[6]	乔东平, 廉婷婷, 苏林伟. 中国儿童福利政策新发展与新时代政策思考——基于2010年以来的政策文献研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019, 19(3): 78-88,95.
[7]	王梦怡. 身份与照顾：农村“双失”儿童的福利困境——基于南京市溧水区的调查[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018, 18(4): 54-59.
[8]	胡杰容. 儿童保护的现实困境与制度创新——以“南京虐童案”为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018, 18(3): 51-58.
[9]	周晓焱, 方伟明, 邱心凯. 以发展为导向的黑龙江省流动儿童福利政策研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2017, 17(6): 66-73.
[10]	汪集锋. 小组工作在儿童福利机构中的实例研究——以GC儿童福利院为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2016, 16(2): 26-31.
[11]	纪文晓1, 2. “认养”：儿童福利服务的一种可能政策选择——基于儿童非正常死亡事件与台湾贫童认养服务的启示[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2014, 14(6): 11-15.
[12]	周晓焱. 发展视角下我国流动儿童福利政策研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2014, 14(5): 54-59.
[13]	冯元1, 彭华民2. 近十年流浪儿童救助困境及对策研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2014, 14(1): 25-31.
[14]	陆士桢,王蕾. 谈我国弱势儿童福利制度的发展[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2013, 13(2): 14-20.
[15]	宣飞霞,王玥. 国外儿童福利模式及孤儿、弃婴救助经验评介[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2013, 13(2): 38-44.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed