社会工作与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 15-22.

• 社会工作 • 上一篇    下一篇

返乡流动儿童抗逆力重构水平与社会工作精准干预策略

魏爽, 张珈雯   

  1. 北京工业大学文法学部, 北京, 100124
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-04 出版日期:2022-01-15 发布日期:2022-01-18
  • 作者简介:魏爽(1971-),女,汉族,副教授,博士;主要研究方向:农民工子女问题。

Research on Reconstruction Level of Returned Migrant Children’s Resilience and Precise Social Work Intervention

WEI Shuang, ZHANG Jiawen   

  1. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China
  • Received:2021-04-04 Online:2022-01-15 Published:2022-01-18

摘要: 通过对16例返乡流动儿童的田野调研发现,其抗逆力重构水平主要由信念系统、自我概念、行动力、情绪情感和社会支持五大因素所决定。文章将返乡流动儿童的抗逆力重构水平分为三个层次,即超越性重构、平衡性重构和失序性重构。社会工作干预应强化返乡流动儿童的信念系统,制定清晰的发展目标;引导积极的自我概念,形成对生活的控制感;提升行动力,养成良好的自律品质;激发正向情感体验,打造稳定的内在心理环境;善用朋辈群体支持,培育滋养性外部环境。

关键词: 返乡流动儿童, 抗逆力, 外部环境, 内在特质, 社会工作干预

Abstract: Through 16 case studies, it is found that the reconstruction level of returned migrant children’s resilience is mainly determined by five major factors—belief system, self-concept, ability to take action, feelings and emotions, and social support. This research distinguishes three reconstruction levels—transcendental reconstruction, balanced reconstruction and disordered reconstruction. The social work intervention should help these children build a stronger belief system to set clear goals, offer guidance for a positive self-concept to gain control of life, improve their ability to take action to become more self-disciplined, arouse their positive emotions to shape a stable internal environment of mentality, and make good use of peer group support to shape a nurturing external environment.

Key words: returned migrant children, resilience, external environment, internal characters, social work intervention

中图分类号: 

  • C916
[1] 中国国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2019年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]. (2020-02-28). http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202002/t20200228_1728913.html.
[2] 张文玉, 宋映泉. 关于回流儿童学业与心理发展的实证研究[M]//中国流动儿童教育发展报告(2019—2020). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2020:10.
[3] WERNER E. Risk, resilience, and recovery: perspectives from the Kauai longitudinal study[J]. Development and psychopathology, 1993, 5(4): 503-515
[4] WERNER E, SMITH R. Overcoming the odds: high-risk children from birth to adulthood[M]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992: 1-302.
[5] GARMEZY N. Stress-resistant children: the search for protective factors [M]//STEVENS J. Recent research in developmental psychopathology. Oxford England: Pergamon Press, 1985: 213-233.
[6] GARMEZY N. Stress, competence, and development: continuities in the study of schizophrenic adults, children vulnerable to psychopathology, and the search for stress-resistant children[J]. American journal of orthopsychiatry, 1987, 57(2): 159-174
[7] 刘丹, 石国兴, 郑新红. 论积极心理学视野下的心理韧性[J]. 心理学探新, 2010(4): 12-17
[8] FRASER M W, KIRBY L D, SMOKOWSKI P R. Risk and resilience in childhood [M]// FRASER M. Risk and resilience in childhood: an ecological perspective[M]. Washington, DC: NASW Press, 1997: 10-33.
[9] RUTTER M. Stress, coping, and development: some issues and some questions [M]//GARMEZY N, RUTTER M. Stress, coping, and development in children. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 1983: 1-42.
[10] MASTEN A S. Resilience in development: implications of the study of successful adaptation for developmental psychopathology [M]//CICCHETTE D. The emergence of a discipline: rochester symposium on developmental psychopathology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987: 261-294.
[11] KUMPFER K L. Factors and processes contributing to resilience: the resilience framework[M]//MEYER D G, JEANNEITE L J. Resiliency and development. Boston: Springer Press, 2002: 179-224.
[12] RICHARDSON G E. The metatheory of resilience and resiliency[J]. Journal of clinical psychology, 2002, 58(3): 313.
[13] 李海垒, 张文新. 心理韧性研究综述[J]. 山东师范大学学报 (人文社会科学版), 2006(3): 149-152
[14] 田国秀, 邱文静, 张妮. 当代西方五种抗逆力模型比较研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2011(4): 9-19
[15] RUTTER M. Resilience: causal pathways and social ecology[M]//WALSH F. The social ecology of resilience. New York: Springer New York Press, 2012: 33-42.
[16] MERTENS D M. Transformative paradigm: mixed methods and social justice[J]. Journal of mixed methods research, 2007, 1(3): 212-225
[17] 田国秀. 从抗逆力视角对“问题青少年”实施干预[J]. 中国青年研究, 2006(11): 5-9
[18] 陈蓓丽. 上海外来女工抗逆力研究[J]. 社会工作下半月 (理论版), 2009(2): 42-44
[19] 钟宇慧.香港抗逆力辅导工作及其启示——以“成长的天空”计划为例[J].广东青年干部学院学报,2009 (3):29-35.
[20] 田国秀, 祝寅. 抗逆力视角下优等生心理压力干预策略探究——基于北京H中学一个个案的跟踪分析[J]. 社会工作, 2013(3): 114-122, 155
[21] 林崇德. 心理学大辞典[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2003.
[22] 同雪莉. 留守儿童抗逆力生成机制及社工干预模式研究[J]. 学术研究, 2019(4): 64-71
[23] 伯纳德·韦纳. 归因动机论[M]. 周玉婷, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2020: 53-54.
[24] 张羽, 邢占军. 社会支持与主观幸福感关系研究综述[J]. 心理科学, 2007(6): 1436-1438
[1] 陈莹. 抗逆力培育下失独老人的身份认同危机及重建[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(1): 23-31.
[2] 周晓春, 韩旭冬, 张肖蒙, 尹姝亚, 聂睿. 留守儿童抗逆力提升的历奇干预:基于混合方法试验研究的项目可行性探讨[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(4): 16-24.
[3] 陶毛毛, 朱眉华. 拨开抑郁的阴霾:癌症患者抑郁情绪的小组干预研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(4): 33-40.
[4] 同雪莉. 高抗逆力的家庭结构与生效机制研究——基于对长期患病家庭的质性分析[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2020, 20(1): 42-52.
[5] 卓彩琴, 冯智珺. 优势视角下促进自闭症人士社会交往的社会工作干预[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019, 19(2): 11-18.
[6] 王海萍, 许秀娴. 我国社会工作干预项目评估流程与方法回顾[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018, 18(5): 15-20.
[7] 陈莹. 从被动性到能动性:失独老人应对养老风险的抗逆力建设[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018, 18(1): 63-68.
[8] 李敏, 刘乐璇. 城市外来女工抗逆力保护因素分析——基于外来女工的个案研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2017, 17(5): 5-11.
[9] 汪菊芬, 李金德. 青年军人家庭抗逆力及其影响因素研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2017, 17(4): 36-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!