社会政策问题的情境主义框架:政治性、情境互动与元治理

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 情境性是政策科学三大基本属性之一，它关注变化着的社会现实对决策模式的影响。情境主义框架的政治性特征影响着政策主体对政策问题的判断与界定，并决定着问题本身成为政策议程并加以讨论的根本可能性；情境行动理论重点关注政策议程设置及政策演进过程中的主要问题；情境互动理论涉及政策执行层面的多元主体互动关系，以及主体之间在资源、信息等方面存在的差异；情境治理则强调政府部门在政策工具选择以及解决政策问题过程中的基本能力。将情境主义分析框架应用于基层治理等关键领域，可以识别政策过程的根本政治属性，判断多元参与主体之间的互动关系，并提出优化政策工具应用模式的具体方式。

关键词: 社会政策, 情境主义, 政治性, 情境互动, 元治理

Abstract: Contextuality is one of the three basic attributes of policy sciences, paying attention to the influence of changing social reality on the decision-making model. Political characteristics of contextualism have an impact on policy subjects’ judgment and definition of policy issues. They also determine the fundamental possibility that the issue itself will be a policy agenda to be discussed. Contextual action theory focuses on the setting of policy agenda and major problems in policy evolution. While contextual interaction theory involves the interaction of multiple subjects at the level of policy implementation and differences among subjects in resources and information. Besides, contextual governance emphasizes the basic ability of government departments to select policy tools and solve policy problems. Contextual analysis will be applied to grassroots governance and other key areas, which helps identify fundamental political attributes in the policy process and analyze the interactive relationship among multiple participants. In these ways, specific methods can be put forward to optimize policy tools application.

Key words: social policy, contextualism, politics, situational interaction, meta governance

中图分类号:

C916

李兵, 昌硕. 社会政策问题的情境主义框架:政治性、情境互动与元治理[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022, 22(3): 92-100.

LI Bing, CHANG Shuo. Contextualism Framework of Social Policy Issues: Politics, Situational Interaction and Meta Governance[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 92-100.

参考文献

[1] HAROLD D. LASSWELL The emerging conception of the policy sciences[J]. Policy sciences, 1970, 1(1): 1-12
[2] ROSNOW, RALPH L. Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science[J]. The journal of nervous and mental disease, 1988, 176(8): 516-517
[3] CHANDRAN KUKATHAS. Contextualism reconsidered: some skeptical reflections[J]. Ethical theory and moral practice, 2004, 7(2): 215-225
[4] BREWER GARRY D. A pre-view of policy sciences: HAROLD D LASSWELL[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 1973, 4(4): 423-424
[5] DOUGLAS TORGERSON. Contextual orientation in policy analysis: the contribution of HAROLD D LASSWELL[J]. Policy sciences, 1985, 18(3): 241-261
[6] YOUNG, RICHARD A. An action approach to career counseling. ERIC digest.[J]. Career awareness, 1995, 7(4): 1-17
[7] 李兵. 中国社会规划的特点和改进方向[J]. 社会政策研究, 2021(2): 13-30
[8] ELKE BRENDEL, CHRISTOPH JÄGER. Contextualist approaches to epistemology: problems and prospects[J]. Erkenntnis, 2004, 61(2/3): 143-172
[9] ABDALLAH, SALAM. Unravelling methodologies: a theory building approach [EB/OL]. [2020-05-01]. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/287/16417_Abdallah%2C%20Salam%202005.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.
[10] CHATAIGNER, PATRICE. A framework analysis of analytical frameworks [EB/OL]. (2017-09-02). https://www.sheltercluster.org/sites/default/files/170902%20Analytical%20Framework%20Review.pdf.
[11] LYSAGHT Z. Epistemological and paradigmatic ecumenism in “pasteur’s quadrant”: tales from doctoral research.[J]. Bulatlat, 2007, 36(28): 23-29
[12] BACHMANN M. The epistemology of understanding: a contextualist approach[J]. Kriterion (Austria), 2020, 34(1): 75-98
[13] KLEIN J T. “Advancing” interdisciplinary sstudies: the boundary work of integrating, complexifying, and professionalizing.[J]. Issues in Interdisciplinary studies, 2018, 9(36): 28-35
[14] SVETLANA NIKITINA. Three strategies for interdisciplinary teaching: contextualizing, conceptualizing, and problem-centring[J]. Journal of curriculum studies, 2006, 38(3): 251-271
[15] MURRAY, JEFF B, EVERS, et al. Theory borrowing and reflectivity in interdisciplinary fields.[J]. Advances in consumer research, 1989, 16(1): 647-652
[16] BARTLETT F C. The policy sciences: recent developments in scope and method[J]. International affairs, 1952, 17(3): 234-235
[17] PORTZ, JOHN. Problem definitions and policy agendas: shaping the educational agenda in boston[J]. Policy studies journal, 1996, 24(3): 371-386
[18] 李兵. 政策解释学和政策科学运动[J]. 行政论坛, 2021(4): 66-72
[19] PAINTER C. The oxford handbook of public policy, Michael Moran, Martin Rein and Robert E. Goodin (eds.)[J]. Public administration, 2009, 87(2): 412-416
[20] WILDAVSKY A , HOROWITZ L . The revolt against the masses: and other essays on politics and public policy[M]. New York: Transaction publishers, 2002: 135-139.
[21] POLLARD S. Labour, social policy and the welfare state (book reviews)[J]. Business history, 1998, 40(7): 24-32
[22] KREŠIMIR PETKOVIĆ. Deborah stone, policy paradox: the art of political decision Making[J]. Small leviathan, 2006, 1(1): 19-32
[23] SCHNEIDER, SAUNDRA K. INGRAHAM, et al. The impact of political participation on social policy adoption and expansion: a cross-national, longitudinal analysis[J]. Comparative Politics, 1984, 17(1): 107-122
[24] GREGG R, MURRAY. Our political nature: the evolutionary origins of what divides us[J]. Politics and the life sciences, 2016, 35(1): 545-547
[25] WALDRON P. Politics: the past and the future[M]. London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2006: 19-27.
[26] ANYEBE, ADAM A. An overview of approaches to the study of public policy[J]. International journal of political science, 2018, 4(1): 8-17
[27] TROPMAN, JOHN E. VASEY, et al. The politics of policy[J]. Governance, 1999, 26(2): 193-195
[28] HUNTER, DAVID J. Evidence-informed policy: in praise of politics and political science[J]. Public health panorama, 2016, 2(3): 268-272
[29] MCLAFFERTY SARA. New strategic perspectives on social policy (book review)[J]. Annals of the association of American geographers, 1983, 73(2): 303-306
[30] SKOCPOL, THEDA, AMENTA, et al. States and social policies[J]. Annual review of sociology, 1986, 12(1): 131-157
[31] THANDIKA MKANDAWIRE. Social policy in a development context[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004: 101-120.
[32] DOERN G, BRUCE. Public policy analysis: an introduction (book-review)[J]. Canadian public policy / analyse de politiques, 1988, 14(2): 183-184
[33] LUMEN LEARNING. Politics, power, and authority [EB/OL] . [2022-01-01]. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-sociology/chapter/politics-power-and-authority/.
[34] MAY, PETER J. Reconsidering policy design: policies and publics[J]. Journal of public policy, 1991, 11(2): 187-206
[35] JOSÉ F. DOMENE, VALACH L , et al. Action in counselling: a contextual action theory perspective[M]. New York: Springer, 2015: 91-93.
[36] YOUNG R A, VALACH L. Action and language: contextual action theory in counselling[J]. Psychologie Francaise, 2016, 61(1): 31-42
[37] ELBANNA, SAID, FADOL, et al. The role of context in intuitive decision-making[J]. Journal of management & organization, 2016, 22(5): 642-661
[38] JOHNS G. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior[J]. Academy of management review, 2006, 31(2): 386-408
[39] BRESSERS J T A . Implementing sustainable development: how to know what works, where, when and how [M]. London: Edward Elgar, 2004: 19-42.
[40] BRESSERS H. Contextual interaction theory and the issue of boundary definition: governance and the motivation, cognitions and resources of actors[J]. Journal of coordination chemistry, 2007, 1(1): 4-29
[41] OWENS, KATHARINE A, BRESSERS, et al. A comparative analysis of how actors implement: testing the contextual interaction theory in 48 cases of wetland restoration[J]. Journal of comparative policy analysis: research and practice, 2013, 15(3): 203-219
[42] ERVING GOFFMAN. Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction[M]. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1961: 96, 19, 80, 138.
[43] KNILL C , TOSUN J. Public policy : a new introduction[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012: 92-94.
[44] UNGSUCHAVAL T. Transcending the institutionalist-interpretivist binary: realizing critical realist theory of governance as metagovernance[J]. Journal of government and politics, 2016, 7(4): 662-695
[45] WHITEHEAD, MARK. “In the shadow of hierarchy”: meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the west midlands[J]. Area, 2003, 35(1): 6-14
[46] BAKER K , STOKER G. Nuclear power and energy policy: the limits to governance[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillian, 2016: 182-191.
[47] BOB, JESSOP. The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development[J]. International social science journal, 1998, 50(155): 29-45
[48] SØRENSEN, EVA. Metagovernance: the changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance[J]. American review of public administration, 2006, 36(1): 98-114
[49] KOOIMAN, JAN, Jentoft, et al. Metagovernance: values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices[J]. Public administration, 2009, 87(4): 818-836
[50] SØRENSEN, EVA, TORFING, et al. Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance[J]. Public administration, 2009, 87(2): 234-258
[51] 习近平. 共产党打江山、守江山, 守的是人民的心[EB/OL]. (2021-05-16). http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2021-05/14/c_1127443941.html.
[52] 习近平在省部级主要领导干部专题研讨班结业式上讲话[EB/OL]. (2011-02-23). http://news.cntv.cn/china/20110223/111288.shtml.
[53] 习近平. 社会治理的重心必须落实到城乡、社区[EB/OL]. (2016-03-05). http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0305/c1024-28174494.html.
[54] 习近平. 决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL]. (2017-10-27). http://www.gov.cn/zhuanti/2017-10/27/content_5234876.html.
[55] 中共中央关于坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化若干重大问题的决定[EB/OL]. (2019-11-05). https://www.12371.cn/2019/11/05/ARTI1572948516253457.shtml.
[56] 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议 [EB/OL]. (2020-11-03). https://www.12371.cn/2020/11/03/ARTI1604398127413120.shtml.
[57] 中共中央国务院关于加强基层治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的意见[EB/OL]. (2021-07-11). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/11/content_5624201.htm.
[58] 中共天津市委十一届七次全会决议[EB/OL]. (2019-11-29). http://cpc.people.com.cn/n1/2019/1129/c64387-31480437.html.
[59] 天津市2021年政府工作报告[EB/OL]. (2021-02-01). http://www.tj.gov.cn/zwgk/zfgzbg/202102/t20210201_5343672.html.
[60] 关于进一步开展社区减负工作依法厘清居民委员会职责提升为民服务效能的意见[EB/OL]. (2020-12-11). http://mz.tj.gov.cn/ZWGK5878/ZCFG9602/zcwj/202012/t20201211_4862973.html.
[61] 天津市委制定印发《关于全面加强城市基层党建工作的意见》[EB/OL]. (2017-10-11). http://dangjian.people.com.cn/n1/2017/1011/c117092-29580624.html.
[62] 加强全市基层居民组织自治能力建设的12条措施发布[EB/OL]. (2021-07-25). http://www.tj.gov.cn/sy/tjxw/202107/t20210725_5517318.html.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed