社会工作与管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 47-58.
• 社会工作 • 上一篇
社会工作服务成效研究：演进与前瞻——基于西方系统评价研究的再评价研究
韩央迪1, 罗小霞1, 李曼雅1, 郭锦蒙2
- 1. 复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院，上海，200433;
2. 中共天津市委党校社会学教研部，天津，300191
Research on Social Work Service Effectiveness, Evolution and Prospects: A Systematic Review Study Based on Western Systematic Reviews
HAN Yangdi1, LUO Xiaoxia1, LI Manya1, GUO Jinmeng2
- 1. School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China;
2. Department of Sociology, Party School of Tianjin Committee of the CPC, Tianjin, 300191, China
摘要： “社会工作有用吗”这一问题道出了社会工作共同体百余年来一直追寻并尝试捍卫的价值认可问题。基于科学检索策略对西方社会工作中有关服务成效的系统评价研究进行再评价研究，以52篇纳入文献作为分析样本，发现社会工作服务成效的相关研究在结论上经历了从无效到部分有效，再到特定背景下特定干预手段对特定对象有效这一过程。西方社会工作服务成效在情境特征、干预过程、评估因素和结果应用等方面呈现出新的趋势和特点，反映了社会变迁背景下人群需求的变异性和服务介入的时代性。这为建构富有成效的中国社会工作服务体系提供了有益启示。
中图分类号:
- C916
| [1] 关信平. 中国共产党百年社会政策的实践与经验[J]. 中国社会科学, 2022(2): 103-122,206. [2] SCHARLE A. Literature review and identification of best practices on integrated social service delivery[R/OL]. [2024-05-06]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=13784&langId=en. [3] 李迎生, 李冰. 走向系统: 近十年来中国社会工作政策发展的轨迹[J]. 社会科学, 2016(12): 74-83. [4] 王思斌. 社会治理结构的进化与社会工作的服务型治理[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014(6): 30-37. [5] 民政部, 财政部. 关于政府购买社会工作服务的指导意见[EB/OL]. [2023-11-14]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2013/content_2361580.htm. [6] 韩江风. 技术治理逻辑下社会工作评估的失灵与优化——以T市W街道社会工作评估项目为例[J]. 理论月刊, 2019(12): 143-154. [7] SHELDON B. Social work effectiveness experiments: review and implications[J]. The British journal of social work, 1986, 16(2): 223-242. [8] KOSBERG J I. Effective social work practice[J]. Gerontologist, 1983, 23(5): 554. [9] SHELDON B. Implementing findings from social work effectiveness research[J]. British journal of social work, 1987, 17(6): 573-586. [10] RICHMOND E M. Social diagnosis[M]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1917: 120. [11] CHEETHAM J. Evaluating social work: progress and prospects[J]. Research on social work practice, 1997, 7(3): 291-310. [12] CHEETHAM J. Evaluating social work effectiveness[M]. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1992: 1. [13] CREE V, JAIN S, HILLEN D P. Evaluating effectiveness in social work: sharing dilemmas in practice[J]. European journal of social work, 2019, 22(4): 599-610. [14] OLSON J J. Social work’s professional and social justice projects: discourses in conflict[J]. Journal of progressive human services, 2007, 18(1): 45-69. [15] HOWE D. An introduction to social work theory[M]. London: Wildwood House/Community Care, 1987: 6. [16] GOREY K M. Effectiveness of social work intervention research: internal versus external evaluations[J]. Social work research, 1996, 20(2): 119-128. [17] TAYLOR B, WYLIE E, DEMPSTER M, et al. Systematically retrieving research: a case study evaluating seven databases[J]. Research on social work practice, 2007, 17(6): 697-706. [18] 竺乾威. 从新公共管理到整体性治理[J]. 中国行政管理, 2008(10): 52-58. [19] 郭伟和. 后专业化时代的社会工作及其借鉴意义[J]. 社会学研究, 2014(5): 217-240,244. [20] BREKKE J S. Shaping a science of social work[J]. Research on social work practice, 2012, 22(5): 455-464. [21] SEGAL S P. Research on the outcome of social work therapeutic interventions: a review of the literature[J]. Journal of health and social behavior, 1972, 13(1): 3-17. [22] FISCHER J. Is casework effect? a review[J]. Social work, 1973, 18(1): 5-20. [23] CORBY B. Applying research in social work practice[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2006: 55. [24] NOLAN T, ZVAGULIS I, PLESS B. Controlled trial of social work in childhood chronic illness[J]. The lancet, 1987, 330(8556): 411-415. [25] FLEXNER A. Is social work a profession?[EB/OL]. [2024-05-17]. https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/social-work/is-social-work-a-profession-1915/. [26] WOOD K M. Casework effectiveness: a new look at the research evidence[J]. Social work, 1978, 23(6): 437-458. [27] REID W J, HANRAHAN P. Recent evaluation of social work: grounds for optimism[J]. Social work, 1982, 27(4): 328-340. [28] RUBIN A. Practice effectiveness: more grounds for optimism[J]. Social work, 1985, 30(6): 469-476. [29] FISCHER J. Isn’t casework effective yet?[J] Social work, 1979, 24(3): 245-247. [30] VIDEKA-SHERMAN L. Meta-analysis of research on social work practice in mental health[J]. Social work, 1988, 33(4): 325-338. [31] MACDONALD G, SHELDON B. Contemporary studies of the effectiveness of social work[J]. The British journal of social work, 1992, 22(6): 615-643. [32] ROSEN A, PROCTOR E K, STAUDT M M. Social work research and the quest for effective practice[J]. Social work research, 1999, 23(1): 4-14. [33] MRAZEK P J, HAGGERTY R J. Reducing risks for mental disorders: frontiers for preventive intervention research[M]. Washington (DC): National Academy Press, 1994: 189. [34] BREKKE J S. A science of social work, and social work as an integrative scientific discipline: have we gone too far, or not far enough?[J] Research on social work practice, 2014, 24(5): 517-523. [35] NORCROSS J C, BEUTLER L E, LEVANT R F. Evidence-based practices in mental health: debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions[M]. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association, 2006: 92. [36] HOWARD M O, GARLAND E L. Social work research: 2044[J]. Journal of the society for social work and research, 2015, 6(2): 173-200. [37] BECKER L, OXMAN A D. Overviews of reviews[M]//HIGGINS J P, GREEN S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. [38] BRIGGS S, NETUVELI G, GOULD N, et al. The effectiveness of psychoanalytic/psychodynamic psychotherapy for reducing suicide attempts and self-harm: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. The British journal of psychiatry, 2019, 214(6): 320-328. [39] ISOKUORTTI N, AALTIO E, LAAJASALO T, et al. Effectiveness of child protection practice models: a systematic review[J]. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2020, 108: 104632. DOI: [40] WANG M, SOKOL R, LUAN H, et al. Mental health service interventions for left-behind children in mainland china: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Children and youth services review, 2020, 117(2): 105304. DOI: [41] HUI E K, TISCHLER V, WONG G H, et al. Systematic review of the current psychosocial interventions for people with moderate to severe dementia[J]. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2021, 36(9): 1313-1329. [42] ZHANG A, JING S, SOLOMON P, et al. Mindfulness-based intervention for Chinese breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Research on social work practice, 2021, 31(7): 683-692. [43] GRAHAM L M, EMBRY V, YOUNG B R, et al. Evaluations of prevention programs for sexual, dating, and intimate partner violence for boys and men: a systematic review[J]. Trauma, violence & abuse, 2021, 22(3): 439-465. [44] SHAW S A, FUNK M. A systematic review of social service programs serving refugees[J]. Research on social work practice, 2019, 29(8): 847-862. [45] CHEN Q, CHAN K L, GUO S, et al. Effectiveness of digital health interventions in reducing bullying and cyberbullying: a meta-analysis[J]. Trauma, violence & abuse, 2022, 24(4): 15248380221082090. DOI: [46] BORNHEIMER L A, ZHANG A, LI J, et al. Effectiveness of suicide-focused psychosocial interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Psychiatric services, 2020, 71(8): 829-838. [47] O’NEAL P, JACKSON A, MCDERMOTT F. A review of the efficacy and effectiveness of cognitive-behaviour therapy and short-term psychodynamic therapy in the treatment of major depression: implications for mental health social work practice[J]. Australian social work, 2014, 67(2): 197-213. [48] HOWES S T, GOREY K M, CHARRON C M. Relative effectiveness of online cognitive behavioural therapy with anxious or depressed young people: rapid review and meta-analysis[J]. Australian social work, 2023, 76(4): 547-561. [49] BLUMENSTEIN K, BROSE A, KEMP C, et al. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy in improving functional health in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2022, 175: 103709. DOI: [50] BEASLEY C C, AGER R. Emotionally focused couples therapy: a systematic review of its effectiveness over the past 19 years[J]. Journal of evidence-based social work, 2019, 16(2): 144-159. [51] KOWITT S D, ELLIS K R, CARLISLE V, et al. Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature[J]. Supportive care in cancer, 2019, 27(1): 97-108. [52] BEZECZKY Z, EL-BANNA A, PETROU S, et al. Intensive family preservation services to prevent out-of-home placement of children: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Child abuse & neglect, 2020, 102: 104394. [53] CHIPALO E. Is trauma focused-cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) effective in reducing trauma symptoms among traumatized refugee children? a systematic review[J]. Journal of child & adolescent trauma, 2021, 14(4): 545-558. [54] LIU Z, YANG F, LOU Y, et al. The effectiveness of reminiscence therapy on alleviating depressive symptoms in older adults: a systematic review[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2021, 12: 709853. DOI: [55] JENKINS S. The limited domain of effectiveness research[J]. The British journal of social work, 1987, 17(6): 587-593. [56] RAYNOR P. Evaluation with one eye closed: the empiricist agenda in social work research[J]. British journal of social work, 1984, 14(1): 635-638. [57] GOREY K M, THYER B A. Differential effectiveness of prevalent social work practice models: a meta-analysis[J]. Social work, 1998, 43(3): 269-278. [58] ZAYAS L H, DRAKE B, JONSON-REID M. Overrating or dismissing the value of evidence-based practice: consequences for clinical practice[J]. Clinical social work journal, 2011, 39(4): 400-405. [59] KAM P K. Back to the “social” of social work: reviving the social work profession’s contribution to the promotion of social justice[J]. International social work, 2014, 57(6): 723-740. [60] DOLLINGER B. Why does social work work? a proposal for a social work understanding of causality[J]. The British journal of social work, 2022, 52(3): 1474-1491. [61] VSETECKOVA J, BOYLE S, HIGGINS M. A systematic review of parenting interventions used by social workers to support vulnerable children[J]. Journal of social work, 2022, 22(4): 992-1030. [62] TRABOLD N, MCMAHON J, ALSOBROOKS S, et al. A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions: state of the field and implications for practitioners[J]. Trauma, violence & abuse, 2020, 21(2): 311-325. [63] BOATNER J, RICE T, PATTERSON D, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of behavioral interventions in adults with co-occurring tobacco and substance use disorders: a systematic review of literature[J]. Journal of social work practice in the addictions, 2020, 20(1): 1-18. [64] LADIS B A, MACGOWAN M, THOMLISON B, et al. Parent-focused preventive interventions for youth substance use and problem behaviors: a systematic review[J]. Research on social work practice, 2019, 35(4): 420-442. [65] HAUG E. Critical reflections on the emerging discourse of international social work[J]. International social work, 2005, 48(2): 126-135. [66] MIDGLEY J. International social work: learning from the third world[J]. Social work, 1990, 35(4): 295-301. [67] LEHMANN D C, BOERDLEIN C. A systematic review of culturally adapted behavioral activation treatments for depression[J]. Research on social work practice, 2020, 30(6): 688-702. [68] MARTINEZ L S, LUNDGREN L, WALTER A W, et al. Behavioral health, primary care integration, and social work’s role in improving health outcomes in communities of color: a systematic review[J]. Journal of the society for social work and research, 2019, 10(3): 441-457. [69] CANUTO K, PRESTON R, RANNARD S, et al. How and why do women’s groups (WGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? a systematic review of the literature[J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(2): 55756. DOI: [70] SHELDON B. The use of single case experimental designs in the evaluation of social work[J]. British journal of social work, 1983, 13(1): 477-500. [71] SHADISH W R, COOK T D, LEVITON L C. Foundations of program evaluation[M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991: 1. [72] LAMEIRAS-FERNÁNDEZ M, MARTÍNEZ-ROMÁN R, CARRERA-FERNÁNDEZ M V, et al. Sex education in the spotlight: what is working? systematic review[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021, 18(5): 2555-2587. [73] YORK A S, ITZHAKY H. How can we measure the effects of client participation on the effectiveness of social work intervention?[J] The British journal of social work, 1991, 21(6): 647-661. [74] DEUTSCHER I, MULLEN E J, DUMPSON J R. Evaluation of social intervention[J]. Contemporary sociology, 1975, 47(4): 634. [75] GRIFFITHS R, DAWBER A, MCDOUGALL T, et al. Non-restrictive interventions to reduce self-harm amongst children in mental health inpatient settings: systematic review and narrative synthesis[J]. International journal of mental health nursing, 2022, 31(1): 35-50. [76] NEWMAN T, ROBERTS H. Assessing social work effectiveness in child care practice: the contribution of randomized controlled trials[J]. Child: care, health and development, 1997, 23(4): 287-296. [77] FLAY B, BIGLAN A, BORUCH R, et al. Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination[J]. Prevention science, 2018, 6(3): 151-175. [78] DE-SMIDT G A, GOREY K M. Unpublished social work research: systematic replication of a recent meta-analysis of published intervention effectiveness research[J]. Social work research, 1997, 21(1): 58-62. [79] THOMLISON R J. Something works: evidence from practice effectiveness studies[J]. Social work, 1984, 29(1): 51-56. [80] OTTO H U, POLUTTA A, ZIEGLER H. Reflexive professionalism as a second generation of evidence-based practice: some considerations on the special issue “what works? modernizing the knowledge-base of social work”[J]. Research on social work practice, 2009, 19(4): 472-478. [81] MORIARTY J, MANTHORPE J. The effectiveness of social work with adults: a systematic scoping review[R/OL]. London: King’s College London, Social Care Workforce Research Unit, 2016. https://core.ac.uk/reader/34724940. [82] 李迎生, 李泉然, 袁小平. 福利治理、政策执行与社会政策目标定位——基于N村低保的考察[J]. 社会学研究, 2017(6): 44-69. |
| [1] | 张芳华, 刘宜君, 陈兆漫. 我国循证社会工作的发展困境与应对策略[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(6): 1-9. |
| [2] | 张巍, 张勇. 我国社会工作范畴辨析及理解分歧[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(6): 10-17,26. |
| [3] | 严云鹤, 林雨晨. 社会工作介入学生援助计划：理论基础、实务探索及展望[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(6): 27-34. |
| [4] | 王海洋. 社会工作“专业关系”的实践反身与知识构建——教学、研究与实践整合的行动研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(6): 35-46. |
| [5] | 唐咏, 严莹. 民政社会工作者的工作角色、职业认同与工作情绪——基于CSWLS 2019数据的研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(5): 1-11. |
| [6] | 张鹏飞, 吴佳峻, 王娟. 社会工作实践研究的哲理基础、解释框架与研究启示[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(5): 12-21. |
| [7] | 邓世仑. 禁毒社会工作实务中伦理困境的辨析与思考——基于伦理绝对主义和伦理相对主义的再认识[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(5): 22-30. |
| [8] | 武小龙, 王心悦. 乡村老年人数字鸿沟的“针灸理念”介入机理与实践逻辑[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(5): 31-39,63. |
| [9] | 刘燕, 王小平. 城乡融合视角下社会工作参与乡村振兴的行为意义和行动空间[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(5): 47-54. |
| [10] | 汤皓然, 罗桥. 陪伴、链接与颠倒的实践感：环境治理中社会工作者的角色形塑过程[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(5): 55-63. |
| [11] | 唐更华, 刘香. 我国社会工作政策区域特征研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(5): 94-102. |
| [12] | 吴晶. 社会工作融入社会企业运营的现状与发展探析——以成都市的实践为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(4): 9-19. |
| [13] | 孙旺辉, 罗明军. “阅读+游戏”疗法减缓患儿医疗恐惧的干预研究——以白血病患儿为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(4): 41-51. |
| [14] | 程瑜, 崔昌杰. 全人照护视角下医务社会工作参与构建普惠性安宁疗护体系的专业优势研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(3): 1-11. |
| [15] | 高海虹, 林益立. 情绪劳动视域下社会工作者离职意愿研究——基于CSWLS数据分析[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024, 24(3): 29-39. |
|
||