SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 39-45,85.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis on the Third-party Evaluation Mechanism from the Perspective of Control Right Theory: A Case Study of a Community Governance Evaluation Program in H City

GU Jiangxia   

  1. School of Humanities and Communication, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510320, China
  • Received:2017-01-01 Online:2017-05-15 Published:2017-05-15

Abstract:

On the basis of briefly reviewing relevant researches on third-party evaluation, this paper adopts a single case analysis to analyze and reflect on the possession and allocation of the control right of third-party evaluation among stakeholders in different stages of the evaluation. In the beginning stage, the third-party evaluating agency and the evaluated agency usually do not have a clear evaluation goal, which is continually clarified and formulated in the implementing stage. In the fixation of evaluation index, the evaluation index system has some eclecticism and compromise. In the implementation of evaluation, the third-party evaluating agency acquires part of the control right of the evaluated agency through contract of government purchasing evaluation service, but such control right is not strictly supervised. When the opacity and transparency of related evaluation information is limited, their relationship is in discordance because of their different pursuits. In the stage of evaluation result release, control right of the evaluation is basically in the hands of entrusting party and the third-party agency. In the end, it raises the question of distributive justice about control right of evaluation in third-party evaluation mechanism, and suggests it is imperative to promote the public participation and build an incentive and restraint mechanism for the evaluation of social service to prevent the loss of efficacy of third-party evaluation.

Key words: the third-party evaluation, control right of evaluation, evaluation standard, evaluation effectiveness

CLC Number: 

  • C912
[1] 芦刚. 地方政府绩效评估中的公民参与: 制度、方法与战略[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2014.
[2] 陈天祥. 社会建设与政府绩效评估研究[M]. 北京:东方出版社, 2010.
[3] 关信平. 社会政策概论[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2014.
[4] 彼得·罗希, 等. 评估: 方法与技术. [M]. 7版. 邱泽奇, 等, 译. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2007.
[5] 陈锦棠, 等. 香港社会服务评估与审核[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008.
[6] 赵环, 徐选国, 杨君. 政府购买社会服务的第三方评估: 社会动因、经验反思和路径选择[J]. 福建论坛(人文社科版), 2015(10): 147-154.
[7] 邓国胜, 等. 民间组织评估体系: 理论、方法与指标体系[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007.
[8] 周雪光. 中国政府的治理模式: 一个"控制权"理论[J]. 社会学研究, 2012(5): 69-93.
[9] 周黎安. 行政发包制[J]. 社会, 2014(11): 1-38.
[10] 折晓叶, 陈婴婴. 项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑——对"项目进村"案例的社会学分析[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(7): 126-148.
[11] 渠敬东. 项目制: 一种新的国家治理体制[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(5): 113-130.
[12] 陈家建. 项目制与基层政府动员——对社会管理项目化运作的社会学考察[J]. 中国社会科学, 2013(2): 64-79.
[13] 大卫·哈维. 新自由主义简史[M]. 王钦. 译. 上海:上海译文出版社, 2016.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!